Domestic terrorism

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Chico23231
12-03-2015, 08:39 AM
I don't know what the answer is but something has to be done.

As a society we are completely out of control when it comes to gun violence.

I agree...its a fact. I don't understand how someone can be on the no fly list, but able to purchase a gun. How is that? Your a threat enough to fly...

MTK
12-03-2015, 09:59 AM
I do know what doesn't work... prayers. We need real solutions.

Chico23231
12-03-2015, 10:08 AM
Who were Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik? - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/03/us/syed-farook-tashfeen-malik-mass-shooting-profile/index.html)

Why isn't CNN reporting that the Shooter recently traveled to the middle east in the last 6 months? Why isn't CNN reporting that Shooter is Muslim?

THIS IS SIGNIFICANT.

Folks, wake up

over the mountain
12-03-2015, 10:58 AM
I dont understand why we need AR-15s and other assault high-capacity rifles. I just dont get that. im sure if they did restrict assault rifles to stringent screening, the bad guys would just use semi automatic hand guns ....

reasonable laws that need to happen now:

1. screening for high capacity guns like AR 15s
2. screening for any person on FBI watch list who attempts to buy a gun
3. all guns must be registered a time of purchase
4. gun owners must report if their gun was stolen, lost or sold to someone else

this wont make attacks not happen but their shouldnt be a zillion restrictions and requirements to drive a car vs zero restrictions to own a AR 15.
----------------------

Chico - it has been reported repeatedly that the male went to SA and came back w a bride and started growing a beard. i heard that about 6:15 pm in teh car last night less then 5 hours after the shootings. what you're saying reminds me of commentators and articles i read on the blaze. they have articles about how msnbc sent out a tweet that the attacks dont seem to be related to a planned parenthood 1 mile away. the conservative blaze commentators are screaming this is liberal msm agenda!!! .... its a tweet. we just had an AR 15 attack at a PP less than a week ago ..... also isnt making an article less then 24 hours after the attack focusing on a tweet from msm .... a conservative agenda to try and nit pick any little thing the msm does to try and corroborate their hard on to prove bias. .. its funny. they have this huge agenda to look for any agenda from msm. double standards at its finest. "ohh nooo, a tweet from msnbc!!!"

of course, the fine ppl at the blaze also think the PP attack was just a bank robbery gone wrong by a obama voting liberal.

they also think this attack yesterday was staged by Obama to go after their guns like newtown was saying "how calm everyone looked on the scene" and "how did so many federal agencies arrive so quickly, its like they were waiting for this to happen bc it was staged!!".

like the benghazi thing. what fucking difference does it make it Obama did not say it was a terrorist attack within the 24 hours of it happening?

Hog1
12-03-2015, 11:45 AM
Some of you are a little to.......hysterical to have a rational discussion at this time

Chico23231
12-03-2015, 11:56 AM
OTM that article is titled "what we know" and it doesn't list those facts...? These are significant facts!

CNN/CNN.com is the most watched/view news org in the world...they should have this..

Chico23231
12-03-2015, 12:25 PM
The reasons why this is terrorism at the least:

1. Seemed planned...from their movements, dress, and weapons to the soft target

2. Dressed in tactical gear. They were dressed like they were going to war, not like they were going to work

3. Explosives found at home, in the vehicle, at the center. folks, they didn't make these like mcgyvar on the fly

4. This was multiperson mass shooting...working as a team. this wasn't irrational, fly off the hook workplace violence.

5. They were comfortable engaging the police. They didn't try to flee, they chose to stay and fight...and die

Reasons why this is Islamic Terrorist:

1. Muslim

2. Woman is involved, this is has become commonplace among Islamic terrorist.

3. Explosives used. they have a knack for this...

4. Recent attacks by other Muslims across the world hitting soft targets..patterns, copy cats, etc

5. Traveled to middle east recently. Folks, its no great secret a lot of these terrorists are going to the middle east for training, resources, and ideological support.



I'll be surprised if this is found as just a workplace violent mass killing...too much planning

Hog1
12-03-2015, 01:02 PM
OTM,
An AR is not really much more or less dangerous than any other semi-auto weapon. Try to eliminate it and Psycho Muslims AND Christians will just take "Next Weapon up". They will not under any circumstances...quit.
When we outlawed some of the scary guns (See Tech 9). It was real scary looking, but basically a piece of shit that you could not hit a barn with........BUT the ignorant public loved it. NO real effect of any kind......
There is an old phrase that goes " When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". While not gospel, it's basically correct.
If we want to have an impact, let's start by shutting down our Wide open borders. Seriously evaluate those who come across and SAY NO when appropriate. Additionally, I heard Bernie the Red (I think) suggest that a coalition needs to approach the NRA and try to get a dialogue going to involve them in making some changes....Very Smart
It's time for some real workable solutions that may have a chance of success rather than the same Bullshit alarmist rhetoric........

Schneed10
12-03-2015, 01:17 PM
Not really sure why some are so intent on rushing to judgment in this thread as to the motivation. Just let the investigation run its course and let all the facts come out.

over the mountain
12-03-2015, 02:18 PM
OTM,
An AR is not really much more or less dangerous than any other semi-auto weapon. Try to eliminate it and Psycho Muslims AND Christians will just take "Next Weapon up".

Yes, i concede that. they would just end up using semi automatic hand guns instead. perhaps more dangerous .. but we do need ARs for "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State".

unfortunately the SCOTUS interpreted "militia" to mean any of age person.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum