Democratic debates

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

BaltimoreSkins
02-04-2016, 07:38 PM
as far as free college - the studies on the original GI bill showed that every $1 spent on getting GIs degrees resulted in adding $7 back into the economy. if done right, free college can actually be a net gain.

To piggy back on this the saving are seen by offering early childhood education as well.

Impact of North Carolina’s Early Childhood Initiatives on Special Education Placements in Third Grade (http://epa.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/12/04/0162373714559096.full.pdf+html?ijkey=rro4HwVYfIeHc&keytype=ref&siteid=spep)

The above is a research article that looked at the social and economic savings in Durham, NC by state funded Pre K. A brief synopsis is that they found a 42% reduction in the need for special services in school by the third grade. In NC the average spent per a pupil in a typical classroom is $8,000 in the third grade while a student that requires accommodations either via an IEP or a 504 the state ends up spending around $16,000 per a pupil. While the savings might be consistent for elementary education the difference between the two would decrease in middle and high school but would still be much higher than a student without accommodations. By investing in education for 2 years before kindergarten the state can end up saving money during a 10 year schooling of a student.

NC_Skins
02-05-2016, 10:01 AM
Not pretending that others aren't taking big bucks from influential donors, but dear lord this woman just doesn't get it.

Clinton defends Wall Street speaking fees: ‘That’s what they offered’ (http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/clinton-defends-wall-street-speaking-fees-%e2%80%98that%e2%80%99s-what-they-offered%e2%80%99/ar-BBp6s5H?ocid=spartanntp)



These "speaking fees" are simply a loophole for Wall Street to put straight cash into Clinton's pocket. Seriously, fuck that cunt rag. No way in hell I would ever vote for her. Truthfully, she should be running on the GOP ticket more so than the current candidates. She's a war hawk that loves banks and spending money on military industry.

MTK
02-05-2016, 12:32 PM
She's still a better option than anyone on the right. Granted the bar is set extremely low.

Schneed10
02-05-2016, 12:56 PM
She's still a better option than anyone on the right. Granted the bar is set extremely low.

Rubio is a genuine threat if he can get past the BS crazies.

Chico23231
02-05-2016, 01:07 PM
Rubio is a genuine threat if he can get past the BS crazies.

Rubio is the man. If he goes with Kasich as his running mate, it could be a wrap folks! Hillary cant beat Rubio in a general election.

I was getting my oil changed yesterday and I walked in the waiting area with a Grandma and this Hispanic dude just crushing Hillary. Grandma was saying, "how can anybody vote for Hillary, she should be locked up!" Hispanic dude was saying she doesn't care about the middle class...bring up wall street.

here some proof:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/05/will-marco-rubio-become-the-choice-for-republicans-who-want-to-win-in-november/

NC_Skins
02-05-2016, 02:13 PM
She's still a better option than anyone on the right. Granted the bar is set extremely low.



That is entirely the point. She's a moderate. Not a progressive. She most likely would be a shoo in on the GOP ticket. I believe most moderates would vote for her before any douche nozzle currently on the GOP ticket.

MTK
02-05-2016, 02:39 PM
Rubio is still a distant 3rd, not really buying him as much of an upgrade over the other two maniacs.

Chico23231
02-05-2016, 02:41 PM
Rubio is still a distant 3rd, not really buying him as much of an upgrade over the other two maniacs.

:laughing2

gotta love politics

Schneed10
02-05-2016, 02:55 PM
Rubio is still a distant 3rd, not really buying him as much of an upgrade over the other two maniacs.

If command of the issues doesn't matter to you, then I guess.

Trump flat out has no idea how anything really works except for international trade. Especially not foreign policy. He comments in depth on trade policy with China, everything else is either amazing, incompetent, great, or stupid.

Cruz is just an asshole and would get beat in a national election. Nobody wants to vote for an asshole. But Santorum was the Iowa winning asshole in 2012 and everyone's favorite Romney ended up winning the nomination. Cruz won't win the nomination.

MTK
02-05-2016, 03:43 PM
Compared to Trump and Cruz, Rubio is legit, but again that's not saying much. It's like saying Grossman was an upgrade over Beck. Well yeah, but he still sucks.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum