Giants Post Game Reactions

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26

Chico23231
09-27-2015, 09:24 AM
These plays that are being called pick plays are the same kind of plays the Patriots run and don't get called for PI. We are held to a different standard cause we have been awful for years.

So stop running them if we can't execute them...it's not hard. That penalty killed a drive and lead directly to the blocked punt.

sdskinsfan2001
09-27-2015, 12:19 PM
Really you think a college QB is going to come in next season and make that much of a difference for us next year. Good Luck with that bro college QB's are very rare breed who are pro ready. They all run the spread offense.

If it was possible to get an absolute guarantee that Goff wouldn't get hurt more than the average qb, then he is heads and shoulders the best qb in the class. But he is small and will get blasted in the NFL.

sdskinsfan2001
09-27-2015, 12:25 PM
Its easy you just cater to the quarterbacks strengths and you go undefeated. It has nothing to do with the rest of your team or your opponent. Gruden must be fired immediately for failing to recognize how easy it is to win.

All you need to do is pass it when the opponent is expecting run, and run when they're expecting pass. And you should be able to know this 100% of the time, obviously.

Player's don't matter. Its not Cousins fault he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn against Giants.

We lost because their players played better than ours. The offense had plenty of chances w/ the plays that were called.

Bucket
09-27-2015, 02:04 PM
I love it when the response to a post is hyperbole. I love how "commitment to run" is bullshit.

We didn't start the game down 2 scores. You don't have to stop running even if you're down 2 scores. Running the ball actually helps an OL. Running the ball actually helps the defense. You can be happy with a gameplan that gives the team's best weapon on offense 6 carries, I'm not.

We gave up 9 off the bat. We were running till then. You missed the whole point

SCRedskinsFan
09-27-2015, 05:14 PM
Right off the bat I can tell we're gonna disagree b/c I believe the players level of execution is a product of how well they are coached and specifically putting them in positions to have success.

So where did J fail you ask?

(1) gameplan....IF our identity is gonna be run focused then we actually need to commit to running the ball. Against the Giants we did not. We did not follow the gameplan that brought success vs the Rams. We followed a gameplan where Kirk was asked to pass the ball too much, thus placing Kirk in position to fail...which he did. Our strength right now is not the passing but the running game....the OL Trent, Scherff, Moses, Alf and Matt Jones.

(2) Personnel and prep punt return unit. The Gints identified a weakness in our punt protection and exploited it. J had a newly active LB (Plummer) in a key position on punt protect and he failed.

(3) Refusal to run the ball on 3rd and 2. Going deep on 3rd and 2. Inefficient.

(4) On a key short yardage conversion attempt using Carrier (who we know is not a proven run blocker) to block the POA as opposed to McCoy (a known effective run blocker).

(5) Targeting Roberts, known to have drop issues last year and displayed those same issues already...Parcells? I believe said think players not plays when it comes to key situations...i.e



I could go on but its late i'm tired but you get the idea....I am not saying the whole game was on J. But since YOU asked for areas where he failed there are some.

HTTR

I almost broke my own cardinal rule never to get into an argument with you. Let's just say that saying "I am not saying the whole game was on J." is disingenuous. Those that are here regularly know better...

You've worn us out, even when we might be inclined to agree with you we can't get ourselves to do so because we don't want to be in the middle of one of your self righteous tirades. Sometimes it's better to just let it go, dude...

Oh boy, I can't believe I said all that.

DYoungJelly
09-27-2015, 07:34 PM
Right off the bat I can tell we're gonna disagree b/c I believe the players level of execution is a product of how well they are coached and specifically putting them in positions to have success.

So where did J fail you ask?

(1) gameplan....IF our identity is gonna be run focused then we actually need to commit to running the ball. Against the Giants we did not. We did not follow the gameplan that brought success vs the Rams. We followed a gameplan where Kirk was asked to pass the ball too much, thus placing Kirk in position to fail...which he did. Our strength right now is not the passing but the running game....the OL Trent, Scherff, Moses, Alf and Matt Jones.

(2) Personnel and prep punt return unit. The Gints identified a weakness in our punt protection and exploited it. J had a newly active LB (Plummer) in a key position on punt protect and he failed.

(3) Refusal to run the ball on 3rd and 2. Going deep on 3rd and 2. Inefficient.

(4) On a key short yardage conversion attempt using Carrier (who we know is not a proven run blocker) to block the POA as opposed to McCoy (a known effective run blocker).

(5) Targeting Roberts, known to have drop issues last year and displayed those same issues already...Parcells? I believe said think players not plays when it comes to key situations...i.e



I could go on but its late i'm tired but you get the idea....I am not saying the whole game was on J. But since YOU asked for areas where he failed there are some.

HTTR

1. 8 in the box all night long. Believe it or not the other team gets a say in what works.

2. A newly signed back up linebacker missing a block on a punt being on the head coach is the craziest thing I've ever read. (I'm not convinced you're serious) NFL teams have two dozen coaches so head coaches don't have to deal with coaching back up LBs on punt block teams.

3. Plays are called to exploit situations. The Giants had been stuffing Alf and Jones all night because they were playing 8 in the box on run downs. Their dbs were playing tight and were setting themselves up for a burn. No problem with a play call that exploits the situation.

4. McCoy played 3 snaps the whole game. Too funny.

5. When McVay relayed the play into Kirk, I'm sure he said "Jay said hit Roberts" Kirk was off all night long. His completed passes were off.

Hog1
09-27-2015, 07:38 PM
1. 8 in the box all night long. Believe it or not the other team gets a say in what works.

2. A newly signed back up linebacker missing a block on a punt being on the head coach is the craziest thing I've ever read. (I'm not convinced you're serious) NFL teams have two dozen coaches so head coaches don't have to deal with coaching back up LBs on punt block teams.

3. Plays are called to exploit situations. The Giants had been stuffing Alf and Jones all night because they were playing 8 in the box on run downs. Their dbs were playing tight and were setting themselves up for a burn. No problem with a play call that exploits the situation.

4. McCoy played 3 snaps the whole game. Too funny.

5. When McVay relayed the play into Kirk, I'm sure he said "Jay said hit Roberts" Kirk was off all night long. His completed passes were off.
Plain to see in the...lack of Yac

punch it in
09-27-2015, 08:35 PM
We gave up 9 off the bat. We were running till then. You missed the whole point


Not to mention we werent going to run it down the Gints throat either way. That was pretty obvious.

Bucket
09-27-2015, 09:20 PM
Not to mention we werent going to run it down the Gints throat either way. That was pretty obvious.

Nothing with missing Lav on the first series.

We didn't abandon the run. The fair weather fans will say we did. The logical fans who understand the game on a NFL level will realize we passed because we were down 2 scores all game.

punch it in
09-27-2015, 09:40 PM
Nothing with missing Lav on the first series.



We didn't abandon the run. The fair weather fans will say we did. The logical fans who understand the game on a NFL level will realize we passed because we were down 2 scores all game.


When u throw in the fact that the Giants after two weeks were dead last against the pass and number one against the run it becomes pretty freaking simple. Even though KC has never ever ever ever hit an open wr 30 yards away and so Gruden is a dumbass for expecting him to do so. LOL
My God did he have ample time and wide open guys. It was pretty obvious why the Giants were dead last against the pass. Too bad he couldnt take advantage. He simply played like dogshit. RG-3 or Colt would not have probably faired any better. Might be a long year if he dont tighten the screws.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum