Hog1
09-23-2015, 09:21 PM
It's a choice like Arsenic....or Russian Roulette. They both may take you to the same place but there is at least some chance of success with one over the other.
Jeb.....
Jeb.....
Republican nominee for PresidentPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[9]
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Hog1 09-23-2015, 09:21 PM It's a choice like Arsenic....or Russian Roulette. They both may take you to the same place but there is at least some chance of success with one over the other. Jeb..... MTK 09-23-2015, 09:37 PM What's the definition of success then? Not sure how any rational person can compare the family resumes and come away thinking the country is better off with another Bush. But I guess if you dig war and recessions bring it on. Hog1 09-23-2015, 10:02 PM I do not have time tonight as other commitments hinder my progress. I'll take the time tomorrow to.....smite you righteously. That Guy 09-23-2015, 10:03 PM unfunded war with (potentially) unfunded tax cuts! balance that budget - yeehaw! I'd also go with neither, unless we're talking bush sr and bill, in which case i'd vote reagan. Hog1 09-25-2015, 07:26 PM I would define success as the resolution to some of the more pressing issues this country faces. Not necessarily in this order or limited to the following: Border control/immigration Budget Deficit/Debt Foreign Policy/Middle East Unemployment Tax Code Reduce the FED Makes no sense to parlay the choice of Bush/Clinton as neither is on my radar AND to stick the war thing on Bush is...absurd CRedskinsRule 09-25-2015, 11:31 PM I would define success as the resolution to some of the more pressing issues this country faces. Not necessarily in this order or limited to the following: Border control/immigration Budget Deficit/Debt Foreign Policy/Middle East Unemployment Tax Code Reduce the FED Makes no sense to parlay the choice of Bush/Clinton as neither is on my radar AND to stick the war thing on Bush is...absurd I absolutely don't believe that HC will be the democratic nominee or that JB will be the republican one. Those two names win the early headlines simply because they are names. But Hillary will lose the Democratic base just like she did to Obama, in 2008. And Bush is running at best 4th, and he's not picking up Trump suppporters after Trump is gone. I don't know who will come out and beat Hillary for the Democratic nomination, but my guess is a new candidate will emerge shortly and be the touted as "true" heir to Obama's policies CRedskinsRule 09-25-2015, 11:39 PM in September 2007, Real Clear Politics polls showed Hillary with a 42 to 23 point (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/democratic_presidential_nomination-191.html) lead over then Sen Obama. Right now she has a 43- 24 point lead (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html) over Sanders. That Guy 09-26-2015, 12:45 AM AND to stick the war thing on Bush is...absurd not the war part, the unfunded part. Chico23231 09-26-2015, 08:36 AM Just curious, would you guys rather have another Bush in the White House or another Clinton? I absolutely want neither. But I think Hillary would do the better job kct1975 09-28-2015, 10:54 AM Personally, I would vote for Dr. Ben Carson. He seems to be the most intelligent candidate, and like Trump, seems to be disconnected enough from the political machine to actually make sense. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum