Republican nominee for President

https://garyjohnson2016.com/

Over the weekend between spending time with boo jank and bbqs, I found a candidate for President that I would actually vote for. Kinda excited to have a dog in the game...If there was any year we needed a 3rd party candidate, its this one.

Take a look at Gary Johnson and the Libertarian party...take time and read through the issues and his common sense approach.
I wish the Libertarians would put a convention on and force the networks to show its ideals with the same amount of the time and effort the other two parties do.

Sent from my S6 Edge

Maybe this is part of their problem in getting... exposure

Libertarian Party chairman candidate strips on stage at national convention - Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/29/libertarian-party-chairman-candidate-strips-stage-/)

Maybe this is part of their problem in getting... exposure

Libertarian Party chairman candidate strips on stage at national convention - Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/29/libertarian-party-chairman-candidate-strips-stage-/)

Lol, love it

Gary Johnson, the only responsible candidate for president - Chicago Tribune (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-gary-johnson-the-only-responsible-candidate-for-president-20160720-story.html)

Wouldn't be something if one of the top newspapers in the country would endorse Gary Johnson?

The number 1 problem with getting support for a 3rd party is the media and its strong established ties to Washington and political parties. Its a sad country we live in these days folks....when you have media empires controlling who is elected. You see Facebook corruptness as well...social media platforms backing one side. Its amazing this isn't a bigger deal. The fucking NBC Today's show interviewed Trump almost every morning during the race for the Republican ticket...free advertising.

There were lines she lifted verbatim. Sorry but there's 0% chance it was a coincidence.

Melania Trump's speech was run through a plagiarism checker (http://mashable.com/2016/07/19/melania-trump-plagiarism-checker/#P_MvUN92Dqqf)

Ok if that's true I'm even more confused.What would be the reasoning behind it for Trump? Are you saying she was sabotaged by the speech writer or any publicity is good publicity?

Sometimes I think they fuck up on purpose because shit like this seems to be endearing to people who support Trump. I mean LOOK at the shit he's said and people just eat it up. I'm sure his supporters are like, "Aw, poor Melania."

Sometimes I think they fuck up on purpose because shit like this seems to be endearing to people who support Trump. I mean LOOK at the shit he's said and people just eat it up. I'm sure his supporters are like, "Aw, poor Melania."


It's amazing how many responses I've seen from people online that don't seem to think plagiarism is a big deal. The anti-intellectual crowd out there is unbelievable.

It's amazing how many responses I've seen from people online that don't seem to think plagiarism is a big deal. The anti-intellectual crowd out there is unbelievable.

I don't think this particular instance is a big deal. A) nobody gives a shit what Michelle Obama said in 2008 at the democratic convention and nobody gives a shit what Melania Trump had to say this week. The spouses of the candidates, with the rare exception of Bill Clinton this year, have no relevancy to the race.

B) the material stolen from Michelle's speech is so innocuous that there's absolutely zero harm done. Michelle didn't have any IP stolen. There were no original or unique ideas expressed there. They both basically said everyone should be able to have the opportunity to work hard to achieve their potential. Who the fuck cares about that?

This is a very annoying much ado about nothing. Plagiarism is a big deal, but if you take it completely out of context then it's an inane academic discussion.

This was not impactful whatsoever and only serves to distract from helpful conversations we should be having.

I don't think this particular instance is a big deal. A) nobody gives a shit what Michelle Obama said in 2008 at the democratic convention and nobody gives a shit what Melania Trump had to say this week. The spouses of the candidates, with the rare exception of Bill Clinton this year, have no relevancy to the race.

B) the material stolen from Michelle's speech is so innocuous that there's absolutely zero harm done. Michelle didn't have any IP stolen. There were no original or unique ideas expressed there. They both basically said everyone should be able to have the opportunity to work hard to achieve their potential. Who the fuck cares about that?

This is a very annoying much ado about nothing. Plagiarism is a big deal, but if you take it completely out of context then it's an inane academic discussion.

This was not impactful whatsoever and only serves to distract from helpful conversations we should be having.

It's an unforgiveable sin to plagerize a candidate's wife's speech from 8 years ago. Lying to the FBI, hey stop the hate!

If anything people should be concerned with the way his campaign is being run, he's been mad sloppy, but of course his supporters don't really care.