Freddie Mitchell as a Redskin?

Joe won't cut Thrash. He is a dedicated player, v popular with his team mates and staff and a solid sepcial teams guy. How many times has Gibbs made comments about Thrash being an example of a perfect Redskin siince he got here. Also, although a vet- he is cheap.

:)

Until he wanted to be traded Gardener was talked up as a very good #2 that has not changed....only the fact that you're now trying to put him down now that the situation has gone bad has changed....
Jacobs is a very solid #2 prospect possibly #1 material...He has great speed, good route running...not great... Gibbs even addressed the issue today or yesterday I believe or why we did not pick a WR...He said that Jacobs has been very impressive in practice.
Patten is a solid #2 or #3.
People talk up Thrash like he is a God...Show me a very good #3 receiver in this league and compare them....You cant....he is at best a #4....#4 receivers spend most of the time on ST...#5 receivers are replacements for the #4 and ST only ...but Brown will be our returner and #4 this year....Bye Thrash we got a younger more skilled player that impresses the coach more than you. Mitchell doesnt really fit in. Where do you put him? #5? He wont go for that. Thrash wont want to be a #5. McCants might. Holiday would love it.
Maybe it is a good philosophy to pack yourself with talent at every position. If you have 5 - #1 receivers I guarantee you will get alot more done than if you have 5 - #5 receivers.
First you should make sure you have the so called "facts" straight, I am/was one of Rod Gardner's supporters on this site. I did not in anyway put him down, what I said was that he would be an excellent 3rd option due to him being so incosistant. Most #2 WR's are more consistant than Gardner.

As for Thrash, what are you smoking? Gibbs will not cut Thrash, period. Thrash is not God by any means, but he has alot of upside and if you watched games last year he was our #3, he was ahead of Jacobs on the depth chart.

You apparently have Brown slated to be our #4 meaning that Thrash is our #5 or is that McCants? I hate to say it but Brown will not be our #4, if he was good enough to be #4 wr material then why didnt any other team pick him up last year. He was only signed on for the last 3 or 4 games last year after being let go by buffalo after 2003.

Moss, Jacobs, Patten, Thrash, McCants that is going to be the 5 WR's next year and you can take that to the bank!!! Brown will hopefully be taking Chad Mortons spot once he is let go June 1st.

Gardner will either be traded or cut for cap room so that we are able to sign our rookies

i would be pissed to let go of a guy who works just as hard as anyone in the league and is great on both sides of ST's in exception to actually being the returner. time after time i seen thrash the first one down the field on punt coverage and also seen him throw good blocks on offense and offensive ST's

I'm sure he's also expressed an interest for playing with the Cowboys and Giants He wants to face the Eagles twice a year, to show them up. I hope it doesn't happen, but if it does, I'm sure "FredEx" will be made aware of his place on the team before he's signed. We also have personalities on this team that could keep him in his place - I don't see Lavar letting "the People's Champion" get too lippy.

Dear God NOOOO! If we signed a toolbox like this guy I really would wonder about our FO.

Fraudy Mitchell + Skins = :vomit-smi

If FRED_EX is signed by the SKins then I will go over to the dark side and say the Gibbs is full of it and puts no stock in character. This guy sold out his own QB. This guy is the last thing this team needs.

As for Thrash, what are you smoking? Gibbs will not cut Thrash, period. Thrash is not God by any means, but he has alot of upside and if you watched games last year he was our #3, he was ahead of Jacobs on the depth chart.


you are absolutely right, every team needs a certain number of "roll players" and thrash is the perfect one. he is great on special teams and he is a solid # 3 wr. he won't complain about anything, he'll just do what the coaches ask of him.
patten also fits the bill of "roll player" in a way. while i really like patten and think he'll be a great wr for the skins, i'm realistic and i understand he could be the teams #1,2 or 3 wr but regardless of whether patten is #1, #2 or #3 he will not complain. he will also do what is asked of him.

Considering where all the head cases are going lately, I wouldn't be surprised to find Mitchell on the Raiders with Randy Moss and Warren Sapp. Then they could get into a three way slap fight as to who is going to be who's bee-otch.