Gibbs meeting with Rod Lardner?

Well, now that I've seen the great Joe Gibbs have to practically genuflect to get the over-paid, under productive louse that is Rod Gardner to play with half a heart next year I am beginning to understand why we didn't take Mike Williams. Gardner was so unproductive last year, Gibbs couldn't even package the guy with our 9 pick to move his sorry, lazy ass. It's a much better idea for us to showcase Gardner for free all season seeing as how we'll be left with no compensation for him after he bolts to the first team stupid enough to over pay him. We of course will be left with an even less effective receivers corps than we have now, forcing the Daniel to go out and overpay for another past his prime veteran. It's so clear to me now. We didn't draft Mike Williams b/c Snyder is going to bring in Jerry Rice at 5 years and $40 million guaranteed. I stand corrected. It's all making sense to me now.

What the hell are you talking about?

what made you a former skinz fan?

I am still aghast at our failure to take Mike Williams in the draft this year. I think for me, it was the straw that broke the camel's back after watching Snyder wreck this team and make us the laughingstock of the league by insisting that Jeff George was our quarterback of the future when every GM in the world knew he was a total bum. I live in Southern California and all I can say to the Mike Williams doubters is this. In spite of SC winning it all and sending Reggie Bush and Matt Leinart to the Heisman ceremony, Mike Williams was still the best player at USC last year. This isn't a repeat of the Michael Westbrook scenario. He's not Keyshawn Johnson either. I know Rogers is a good player, but we left a franchise wide out on the table to do it and I think it will go down as the worst mistake we've ever made in the draft. And most importantly, it's going to cost our already anemic passing offense about 10-15 touchdowns a year for the next decade. And I'm still confused as hell as to why we had to trade all the way up into the first round to take a QB who was going to be available for the next two or three rounds at least.

If we start winning next year, I hope you stay a 'formerskinzfan'.

I am still aghast at our failure to take Mike Williams in the draft this year. I think for me, it was the straw that broke the camel's back after watching Snyder wreck this team and make us the laughingstock of the league by insisting that Jeff George was our quarterback of the future when every GM in the world knew he was a total bum. I live in Southern California and all I can say to the Mike Williams doubters is this. In spite of SC winning it all and sending Reggie Bush and Matt Leinart to the Heisman ceremony, Mike Williams was still the best player at USC last year. This isn't a repeat of the Michael Westbrook scenario. He's not Keyshawn Johnson either. I know Rogers is a good player, but we left a franchise wide out on the table to do it and I think it will go down as the worst mistake we've ever made in the draft. And most importantly, it's going to cost our already anemic passing offense about 10-15 touchdowns a year for the next decade. And I'm still confused as hell as to why we had to trade all the way up into the first round to take a QB who was going to be available for the next two or three rounds at least.

You idiot, Mike Williams didnt play last year. Wasn't David Terrell supposed to be Chicago's savior wide out? Where is he now? Mike Williams wont even be as good as Keyshawn and I think Keyshawn sucks. Go jump on the San Diego Chargers bandwagon and get on their website. We'll see you next year after the Skins win Super Bowl XL. We dont need any haters, so dont let the door hit cha' where the good lord split ya'.

Hmmmmmm, lets see - Skinzdomin8, formerskinzfan: same inability to spell, same assinine comments, same lame attitude.

Gosh, wonder if it's the same guy?? :Smoker:

And I'm still confused as hell as to why we had to trade all the way up into the first round to take a QB who was going to be available for the next two or three rounds at least.

Regardless of the wisdom of trading up - your comments just highligt your ignorance. Campbell was going to be gone by the 3rd pick in the 2nd round (Cleveland) or perhaps TBay or perhaps Arizona. He was the 3rd QB on everyone's boards.

Sorry - I shouldn't even post responses to you. It's a waste of time. But then, being a waste of space - you probably can relate.

Well, now that I've seen the great Joe Gibbs have to practically genuflect to get the over-paid, under productive louse that is Rod Gardner to play with half a heart next year I am beginning to understand why we didn't take Mike Williams. Gardner was so unproductive last year, Gibbs couldn't even package the guy with our 9 pick to move his sorry, lazy ass. It's a much better idea for us to showcase Gardner for free all season seeing as how we'll be left with no compensation for him after he bolts to the first team stupid enough to over pay him. We of course will be left with an even less effective receivers corps than we have now, forcing the Daniel to go out and overpay for another past his prime veteran. It's so clear to me now. We didn't draft Mike Williams b/c Snyder is going to bring in Jerry Rice at 5 years and $40 million guaranteed. I stand corrected. It's all making sense to me now.
Calm down Beavis.

Peter Warrick and Plaxico also lived up tp their potential.