Walters new column 4/25/05

Pages : 1 [2]

BossHog
04-26-2005, 03:08 PM
...Williams is a man among boys in the redzone....is simply is a take your breath away player...

So what about the other 80 yards on the field? My point is, we've already adressed or WR needs (part of that was forced by Coles demanding a trade). Just for arguing sakes, what type of success do you think Mike Williams will have against a number one corner such as Spriings, Bailey, or McCalister? With the new illegal contact rules speedy WRs were more sought than the slower posession WRs. How come so many CBs were taken so early? Why was Matt Jones the fourth WR drafted? :oink:

TheMalcolmConnection
04-26-2005, 03:16 PM
I still wish that somehow we would have ended up with Jones.

BossHog
04-26-2005, 03:23 PM
I liked Matt Jones too. More than I liked Mike Williams. Now, if we passed on him at number 25, I would've been sick. :oink:

BossHog
04-26-2005, 03:31 PM
Then again, it wouldn't have lasted long. Unlike some of you guys, I'm able to seperate my Madden life from reality. Anybody see the commercial for 2006? It seems like the intro only will have the improved graphics. The screenshots don't look as tight. :oink:

TheMalcolmConnection
04-26-2005, 03:34 PM
I really have never played Madden since it was NFL Football 94 for Sega. Hopefully that gives me a less-skewed view. :)

MTK
04-26-2005, 04:16 PM
Then again, it wouldn't have lasted long. Unlike some of you guys, I'm able to seperate my Madden life from reality. Anybody see the commercial for 2006? It seems like the intro only will have the improved graphics. The screenshots don't look as tight. :oink:

The whole commerical looked pretty damn sick to me, you weren't impressed??

NYCSkin
04-26-2005, 04:33 PM
So what about the other 80 yards on the field? My point is, we've already adressed or WR needs (part of that was forced by Coles demanding a trade). Just for arguing sakes, what type of success do you think Mike Williams will have against a number one corner such as Spriings, Bailey, or McCalister? With the new illegal contact rules speedy WRs were more sought than the slower posession WRs. How come so many CBs were taken so early? Why was Matt Jones the fourth WR drafted? :oink:
Mike Williams will fare just fine against todays #1 corners. If you play to his strengths--like Pete Carroll did--he is going to be a hell of a weapon. The new contact rules benefit receivers who can get off the ball well (not get bumped off within 5 yards--which the little WRs have to overcome) and those who can create their own space once downfield. Space can be created by a couple ways: by being a target in a zone defense, by running away from the DB in man to man, or by outboxing the DB in check coverage. Mike Williams will not get knocked off the ball with his frame, and can create space in a zone and on boxout plays. He might not be able to blow by people on the post--but isn't that why we have Moss and Patten? The bottom line is big or small if a receiver can create get off the line (by using his size or speed) and create space--then you've got a player--which Williams is.
I do think picking a CB was fine--but in this draft where the CB was deep--we had greater value picking Williams at 9 and a CB later.
Matt Jones has great combine numbers. And 5 career catches. That's all we can say about him at this point...

PFunk26
04-26-2005, 04:44 PM
In my opinion Mike Williams will become a Marcus Robinson type player good for the occasional jump ball but never relizing the true potential. I wanted him at first when he fell to us but now that I rethought it I like Rodgers. Campbell I'm hoping we wind up in the Chargers situation, Ramsey blows up and Campbell sits there thus is my dream, hopefully soon to be a reality

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum