kingerock
04-25-2005, 07:13 AM
As I sat and watched the Redskins offseason trades, moves, signings and then the draft I couldn't help but think to myself, "what in God's name is going on here!?" This isn't the Redskins offseason that I've come to know and love with midnight flights and major moves and signings. Then the draft and the seemingly wasted pick on a QB at #25 that may not play for a couple years, if at all, as a Redskins with potentially better players available for our immediate needs.
Then, at about 4:30 a.m. it all hit me. What if a team made decisions in the offseason that could payoff in the regular season? What if a not-so-flashy offseason resulted in a better than .500 regular season? That's all it takes in the NFC to make the playoffs.
So here is my conspiracy theory on the 2005 Redskins offseason:
#1. Gardner allowed to seek a trade
Why was Rod Gardner and his agent allowed to seek a trade and nothing was able to be done? I think no one expected to get alot, if anything at all, in return for him, but was there no team of the other 31 out there that could work out any deal for a big tall possesion WR looking for a change of scenery?
Maybe he was given the freedom to seek a trade to realize one thing; no one wants an under-performer. No one will spend a dime on a "potentially great" possesion WR. So, as it stands now, we have a big possesion WR with a desire for a new home coming up on a contract year and the ability to potentially write his own check for the 2006 season, based on his ability to perform. Does he pull a M Muhhamed and have a breakout season? If so, all the better for the Redskins who need a big possesion WR to compliment the speedy WRs they aquired in the offseason.
#2. The trade for the #25 spot in the draft
I, like most of you, probably thought long and hard about this one. The Redskins gave away 3 draft picks (next years #1 and 4, this years #3) to get the #25 pick in the draft. Why give up 3 picks, to move up high and draft a QB that could be sitting the bench (or worse, the practice squad) for 1 or more seasons? No one expects him to be playing anytime soon, if ever, as a Redskin. Why was he worth so much?
I see 3 reasons, the most important, our 2006 cap figures. There is no secret that the 2006 Redskins cap wont have enough room to buy groceries, let alone sign any high profile FAs or rookies in the draft. While the Redskins can afford to sign rookies this season, they really wont be able to next season. So what do you do? You make the 2006 #1 pick in 2005. You bring him (Jason Campbell, QB-Auburn) in when you have 3 QBs on your roster that you are happy with and with him having little to no barganing power for a massive 1st round rookie contract. You put him with 2 veteran QBs and what some consider to be an outstanding QB coach and you get him learning your offense and the speed of the NFL for an entire season before he will ever touch the turf. And, what most people will miss, you keep him off the Eagles roster. Donovan will be the 2006 Madden cover boy, which means he will either go down with injury or have a sub-par season. You keep a strong armed QB from being able to chunk the ball up to TO when Donovan can't.
#3. You build a team to beat the Eagles
In my opinion, 3 teams in the NFC have done there homework and figured out what needs to be done in the offseason. The Cowboys, Vikings, and Redskins all seem to be on the right track. You don't build a team to be the best in the NFL, that's impossible with the top AFC teams so stacked and only getting stronger. You build a team to beat the Philly Eagles, who have had a strangle-hold on the NFC for 4 years now. How do you beat the Eagles? You beat Donovan McNabb. You apply pressure with the blitz and you contain him in the pocket, not allowing him to use his feet. That means your focus has to be defense. With the Gregg Williams style defense, the drafted CB (Carlos Rodgers, CB-Auburn) and the players returning from injury (Arrington, Bowen, etc...) you have a defense with speed and the ability to get to the QB while creating a blanket over TO and being able to matchup 1 on 1 with any other WR on their squad. Even if the Redskins could split games with the Eagles, Giants and Cowboys this season, they have regular season games against the 49ers, Bucs, Seahawks, Bears and Cardinals, and the potential for 8 wins there. Eight wins in the NFC is almost a lock on a wild card spot.
So for what it's worth, that's my take on the not-so-normal, but not-so-bad Redskins offseason. If it works, we'll be looking back on the genius of Gibbs and Cerrato for years to come. If it fails, we'll be calling for resignations and College coaches to save us from ourselves!
Then, at about 4:30 a.m. it all hit me. What if a team made decisions in the offseason that could payoff in the regular season? What if a not-so-flashy offseason resulted in a better than .500 regular season? That's all it takes in the NFC to make the playoffs.
So here is my conspiracy theory on the 2005 Redskins offseason:
#1. Gardner allowed to seek a trade
Why was Rod Gardner and his agent allowed to seek a trade and nothing was able to be done? I think no one expected to get alot, if anything at all, in return for him, but was there no team of the other 31 out there that could work out any deal for a big tall possesion WR looking for a change of scenery?
Maybe he was given the freedom to seek a trade to realize one thing; no one wants an under-performer. No one will spend a dime on a "potentially great" possesion WR. So, as it stands now, we have a big possesion WR with a desire for a new home coming up on a contract year and the ability to potentially write his own check for the 2006 season, based on his ability to perform. Does he pull a M Muhhamed and have a breakout season? If so, all the better for the Redskins who need a big possesion WR to compliment the speedy WRs they aquired in the offseason.
#2. The trade for the #25 spot in the draft
I, like most of you, probably thought long and hard about this one. The Redskins gave away 3 draft picks (next years #1 and 4, this years #3) to get the #25 pick in the draft. Why give up 3 picks, to move up high and draft a QB that could be sitting the bench (or worse, the practice squad) for 1 or more seasons? No one expects him to be playing anytime soon, if ever, as a Redskin. Why was he worth so much?
I see 3 reasons, the most important, our 2006 cap figures. There is no secret that the 2006 Redskins cap wont have enough room to buy groceries, let alone sign any high profile FAs or rookies in the draft. While the Redskins can afford to sign rookies this season, they really wont be able to next season. So what do you do? You make the 2006 #1 pick in 2005. You bring him (Jason Campbell, QB-Auburn) in when you have 3 QBs on your roster that you are happy with and with him having little to no barganing power for a massive 1st round rookie contract. You put him with 2 veteran QBs and what some consider to be an outstanding QB coach and you get him learning your offense and the speed of the NFL for an entire season before he will ever touch the turf. And, what most people will miss, you keep him off the Eagles roster. Donovan will be the 2006 Madden cover boy, which means he will either go down with injury or have a sub-par season. You keep a strong armed QB from being able to chunk the ball up to TO when Donovan can't.
#3. You build a team to beat the Eagles
In my opinion, 3 teams in the NFC have done there homework and figured out what needs to be done in the offseason. The Cowboys, Vikings, and Redskins all seem to be on the right track. You don't build a team to be the best in the NFL, that's impossible with the top AFC teams so stacked and only getting stronger. You build a team to beat the Philly Eagles, who have had a strangle-hold on the NFC for 4 years now. How do you beat the Eagles? You beat Donovan McNabb. You apply pressure with the blitz and you contain him in the pocket, not allowing him to use his feet. That means your focus has to be defense. With the Gregg Williams style defense, the drafted CB (Carlos Rodgers, CB-Auburn) and the players returning from injury (Arrington, Bowen, etc...) you have a defense with speed and the ability to get to the QB while creating a blanket over TO and being able to matchup 1 on 1 with any other WR on their squad. Even if the Redskins could split games with the Eagles, Giants and Cowboys this season, they have regular season games against the 49ers, Bucs, Seahawks, Bears and Cardinals, and the potential for 8 wins there. Eight wins in the NFC is almost a lock on a wild card spot.
So for what it's worth, that's my take on the not-so-normal, but not-so-bad Redskins offseason. If it works, we'll be looking back on the genius of Gibbs and Cerrato for years to come. If it fails, we'll be calling for resignations and College coaches to save us from ourselves!