saden1
12-07-2014, 10:10 PM
Well I don't know how you can view him as an asshole if he is speaking the truth? To me it sounds like he is tried of how the players are to blame and he is showing you evidence why it's not their fault. And he is nothing kike McNabb...London has no ax to grind...he left on his own and would have retired earlier had the Skins not begged him to return.
donofriose
12-07-2014, 10:13 PM
I feel like Fletcher could end up the next McNabb. A guy who had a clean image as a player who outs himself as being an asshole now that he's in the media.
I think he is going to be a perfect example of why it is often a bad idea to like certain NFL players because of the great person they are/appear to be.
Well I don't know how you can view him as an asshole if he is speaking the truth? To me it sounds like he is tried of how the players are to blame and he is showing you evidence why it's not their fault.
Speaking the truth doesn't absolve someone of being an asshole.
donofriose
12-07-2014, 10:17 PM
Well I don't know how you can view him as an asshole if he is speaking the truth? To me it sounds like he is tried of how the players are to blame and he is showing you evidence why it's not their fault. And he is nothing kike McNabb...London has no ax to grind...he left on his own and would have retired earlier had the Skins not begged him to return.
You can be honest but there is a fine line between being honest and being disrespectful. I think he crossed it.
I think what he said was correct... He just said it in an extremely disrespectful way.
He also came back for the money more than anything else in my opinion.
saden1
12-07-2014, 10:29 PM
Speaking the truth doesn't absolve someone of being an asshole.
The truth is self-evident and can seem ugly. Perhaps you want him to be more "constructive" in his criticism?
The truth is self-evident and can seem ugly. Perhaps you want him to be more "constructive" in his criticism?
What's wrong with being constructive, or simply more professional?
Considering how Haz always had his back even when it was obvious he had no business being on the field, you would think a more constructive tone wouldn't have been too much to ask.
saden1
12-07-2014, 10:36 PM
Jim is clueless. ...Jim is still around while all his former bosses are not...London saw Jim first hand and can speak on the matter. I think London has earned the right to speak freely and not be labeled an asshole.
Jim is clueless. ...Jim is still around while all his former bosses are not...London saw Jim first hand and can speak on the matter. I think London has earned the right to speak freely and not be labeled an asshole.
He can speak all he wants, it's his opinion. And my opinion is he's an asshole for the way he went about it.
saden1
12-07-2014, 11:01 PM
Opinion? Opinion is "a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge." The film doesn't lie neither does Jim's tenure.
mooby
12-07-2014, 11:06 PM
For me it feels like London had a very valid point, but expressed it in poor manner. I ain't no fan of Haslett either but there are better ways for Fletch to say how he feels.