|
punch it in 11-07-2014, 08:25 PM With the investment we have in him, RGIII will absolutely get another offseason to "get it." Should he? Probably not, but, barring injury, he's firmly in place through next year. After that, I think all bets are off.
I know that sounds like he's on a very long leash, and he is, but remember what the organization gave uo for him. Right or wrong, the front office will not write that off until 2015 is over. My opinion, and if SS thinks otherwise, I'll jump ship with him immediately...
I think you are rite. (Unless SS disagrees - than i jump ship too. Lol). Seriously what you say makes sense. The thing is I like Jay Gruden alot. Just something about him I appreciate and I hope at the end of it all - no matter what becomes of Griff - that he is still our HC. Ideally That Griff becomes great under his watch of course.
calia 11-07-2014, 08:30 PM I like Gruden too. Straight shooter without the silly evasive nonsense that Shanny (and Hoodie) pull with the media, which has always struck me as childish. I thought the way he called out the amatuerish reporting was terrific, and it wasn't eye-rolling, evasions -- he took it head on and then moved to the next question.
I also like that he has a sense of humor -- that job has a lot of pressure, and I think being able to chuckle from time to time is going to help against burnout.
SirLK26 11-07-2014, 09:39 PM Who doesn't want a fairytale ending here, with Gruden committing to Griffin and Griffin responding with 10 years of outstanding quarterback play and a Super Bowl or two? That said, if it actually comes down to a choice between the two, Gruden should be the guy to stay IMO. Griffin is the closest thing we've had to a franchise quarterback in a long time, but he'll likely never reach that potential if we keep changing coaches. I love what I see out of Gruden and definitely think he's capable of finding a quarterback he's comfortable with(even if not as talented as Griffin) and then winning.
SCRedskinsFan 11-07-2014, 10:50 PM Who doesn't want a fairytale ending here, with Gruden committing to Griffin and Griffin responding with 10 years of outstanding quarterback play and a Super Bowl or two? That said, if it actually comes down to a choice between the two, Gruden should be the guy to stay IMO. Griffin is the closest thing we've had to a franchise quarterback in a long time, but he'll likely never reach that potential if we keep changing coaches. I love what I see out of Gruden and definitely think he's capable of finding a quarterback he's comfortable with(even if not as talented as Griffin) and then winning.
^^^^
DITTO
Can't believe I said that.....
SweatTheDetails 11-08-2014, 05:15 PM So are we going back to a 4-3. This 3-4 thing always felt strange to me and it has never worked. I miss the days of having pass rushing DE's (Mann and Manley) and runstuffing DT (Butz any one) The 3-4 was a cute fad but its time to go. I see Kerrigan and Orakpo (if he stays) playing great with their hands in the dirt. Hatcher could play that scheme but the rest of those fat, unathletic DT's have to go.
EARTHQUAKE2689 11-08-2014, 06:26 PM So are we going back to a 4-3. This 3-4 thing always felt strange to me and it has never worked. I miss the days of having pass rushing DE's (Mann and Manley) and runstuffing DT (Butz any one) The 3-4 was a cute fad but its time to go. I see Kerrigan and Orakpo (if he stays) playing great with their hands in the dirt. Hatcher could play that scheme but the rest of those fat, unathletic DT's have to go.
Rak is not staying.
Chico23231 11-08-2014, 06:43 PM So are we going back to a 4-3. This 3-4 thing always felt strange to me and it has never worked. I miss the days of having pass rushing DE's (Mann and Manley) and runstuffing DT (Butz any one) The 3-4 was a cute fad but its time to go. I see Kerrigan and Orakpo (if he stays) playing great with their hands in the dirt. Hatcher could play that scheme but the rest of those fat, unathletic DT's have to go.
If we do, and I think its probable, it much less painful than going from a 4-3 to a 3-4 imo. Just need to find a MLB
Rotten1980 11-09-2014, 02:28 AM It will be a damn shame if Rak leaves for a 4-3 defense and kicks ass, which he will, and then we switch to a 4-3. It'd be quintessential Redskins though.
Chico23231 11-09-2014, 08:53 AM It will be a damn shame if Rak leaves for a 4-3 defense and kicks ass, which he will, and then we switch to a 4-3. It'd be quintessential Redskins though.
What makes you so sure he becomes an all pro in a 4-3 defense? He still got to go up against tackles?
So are we going back to a 4-3. This 3-4 thing always felt strange to me and it has never worked. I miss the days of having pass rushing DE's (Mann and Manley) and runstuffing DT (Butz any one) The 3-4 was a cute fad but its time to go. I see Kerrigan and Orakpo (if he stays) playing great with their hands in the dirt. Hatcher could play that scheme but the rest of those fat, unathletic DT's have to go.
Half the teams in the league run a 3-4 so it's a bit more than a fad.
In the end it's all about the players anyway.
|