BaltimoreSkins
09-15-2014, 08:43 PM
the trial is scheduled for 2015.
what are they supposed to do?
deactivate him until his trial, continuing to pay him to do nothing?
have the NFL dish out punishment before the justice system has its say?
do they completely disregard the legal system and kick him out of the league? is there a process for that that is fair as well as capable of pleasing the court of public opinion?
this is why the NFL's move (back around when Vick got in trouble) to run as some moral police over their league parallel to the justice system was stupid. i, as well as many others, said it at the time (we can't say much now though, because you're attacked when you do.) it only leads down one path, and this is that path.
the NFL is going to look super stupid when Rice wins his appeal for being disciplined twice for the same thing, all as a PR move.
the league needs to reverse course. they're a business and they should discipline players of on the field issues and let the legal system handle off the field issues.
there is no winning. there will be mistakes, uneven punishments, and situations that don't make sense.
if they don't then their only other option is to way over discipline players. and i'll laugh my ass off when all these righteous redskins fans start complaining about how unfair it is one of our guys got a ridiculous punishment before being found guilty of anything.
I have mixed emotions about this, on one hand I do think the NFL should wait to see what the justice system says, but on the other hand they are public figures and are held accountable in ways that the average public is and they know that when they sign their contract. I work in education and I recognize that being an educator of the youth my private life has to remain exactly that. If a family sees me having a drink at the bar and tells the administration at my school that I was drunk I might find myself at the warehouse instead of the classroom until an investigation is completed. Is it fair? no but it comes with the territory.
what are they supposed to do?
deactivate him until his trial, continuing to pay him to do nothing?
have the NFL dish out punishment before the justice system has its say?
do they completely disregard the legal system and kick him out of the league? is there a process for that that is fair as well as capable of pleasing the court of public opinion?
this is why the NFL's move (back around when Vick got in trouble) to run as some moral police over their league parallel to the justice system was stupid. i, as well as many others, said it at the time (we can't say much now though, because you're attacked when you do.) it only leads down one path, and this is that path.
the NFL is going to look super stupid when Rice wins his appeal for being disciplined twice for the same thing, all as a PR move.
the league needs to reverse course. they're a business and they should discipline players of on the field issues and let the legal system handle off the field issues.
there is no winning. there will be mistakes, uneven punishments, and situations that don't make sense.
if they don't then their only other option is to way over discipline players. and i'll laugh my ass off when all these righteous redskins fans start complaining about how unfair it is one of our guys got a ridiculous punishment before being found guilty of anything.
I have mixed emotions about this, on one hand I do think the NFL should wait to see what the justice system says, but on the other hand they are public figures and are held accountable in ways that the average public is and they know that when they sign their contract. I work in education and I recognize that being an educator of the youth my private life has to remain exactly that. If a family sees me having a drink at the bar and tells the administration at my school that I was drunk I might find myself at the warehouse instead of the classroom until an investigation is completed. Is it fair? no but it comes with the territory.