SirLK26
05-10-2014, 06:00 PM
How is it fair that Seastrunk gets his own thread before this dude? Discuss Grant here.
My question is: "What does this move mean for our current WR corps?"
EARTHQUAKE2689
05-10-2014, 06:09 PM
^Seastrunk is the better player, and I don't think it means much of anything right now.
artmonkforhallofamein07
05-10-2014, 06:12 PM
I don't see how Seastrunk, other than his name, is better than a guy who had 75+ catches, 1,100 + yards each of the last two years. Grant I think can contribute.
SirLK26
05-10-2014, 06:14 PM
Hey, he's got some legit hands. Although it's definitely a crowded group ahead of him.
Robinson, Hankerson, Gettis, Williams? You've got a rookie with great hands breathing down your neck; step up or face the consequences.
artmonkforhallofamein07
05-10-2014, 06:16 PM
Good hands and solid route running. Just not the burner speed. He may develop into a good #4 or possession receiver in our corp. he has potential to beat out the best of the rest of our WRs in a year or two.
EARTHQUAKE2689
05-10-2014, 06:26 PM
I don't see how Seastrunk, other than his name, is better than a guy who had 75+ catches, 1,100 + yards each of the last two years. Grant I think can contribute.
Averaging 8-9 yards a carry will do that, I think Grant can contribute, but I think Seastrunk is the better player right now, just plays a devalued position.
artmonkforhallofamein07
05-10-2014, 06:31 PM
I guess I am just splitting hairs ... Not like we really needed another WR either lol
GTripp0012
05-10-2014, 07:43 PM
Ryan Grant can clearly play, but he's more of a quiet production guy than a physical marvel, and it is not clear to me where he fits in the receiver rotation on this team. He may very well end up being a better option than Andre Roberts down the road, but then you have all this money invested in Andre Roberts.
Chico23231
05-10-2014, 07:46 PM
Ryan Grant can clearly play, but he's more of a quiet production guy than a physical marvel, and it is not clear to me where he fits in the receiver rotation on this team. He may very well end up being a better option than Andre Roberts down the road, but then you have all this money invested in Andre Roberts.
So u can't draft a guy with similar skill set to Andre Roberts? All this money, I don't think Roberts contract restricts our ability to pay anybody
artmonkforhallofamein07
05-10-2014, 08:20 PM
Pay or play anybody. Andre will beat out Grabt anyway this year, but who knows if he can challenge in two or three