2014 NFL Draft: Rounds 2-3

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

CRedskinsRule
05-09-2014, 09:06 PM
Moving on, picks are all the way up to SF at 61. 5 more picks to our next selection. Also we are at the point where our 5th rounder should be fair trade value if we want to move up.

artmonkforhallofamein07
05-09-2014, 09:07 PM
Sorry Lotus...

Vent on everyone back to the terrible shooting in the Wiz game

Chico23231
05-09-2014, 09:07 PM
Side note, the espn coverage is flat out ballin tonight. This desk kills berman, gruden and Ray Ray last night

Ruhskins
05-09-2014, 09:08 PM
People need to chill the F out. It's not like we're picking two WRs and a TE in the same round. We have two third rounders anyway.

SirLK26
05-09-2014, 09:08 PM
Obviously the whole thing is a crapshoot. Alex Smith vs Tom Brady. However, as a fan or an expert we cannot predict the future. As it stands now Murphy is a reach that early. No question about it. Question about the future - sure. Rite now - makes little sense. Hope im dead wrong.

I'm just saying that people are complaining that this pick was a reach at a position that they as fans don't view as a need, but the FO likely sees it an entirely different way. I think Trent Murphy was the BPA, so they took him.

punch it in
05-09-2014, 09:08 PM
So true. Anything kills Berman that doesnt have Berman. Lol. Ray ray was awful. I love Gruden though.

artmonkforhallofamein07
05-09-2014, 09:08 PM
Ask you the same thing i asked Matty. Would you have made that pick if given the honor?

If I was in the Redskins draft room and had all the opinions they did I don't know.

calia
05-09-2014, 09:09 PM
Bench him for Cousins week 1, Calia. Besides the draft is over and the season starts tomorrow. We might as well just wait till our first pick in next years draft for any hope of having a winning football team... SMMFH

Dude, all I am saying is that we have more pressing needs than OLB, particularly given how bad our O-line was last year (and secondary). I don't think that's an unreasonable conclusion, and I don't think drafting for need is a bad approach either.

Don't get me wrong -- I get the best player available approach too, but does anyone think this guy is that? The write-ups on hims are solid, projecting him as a 2-3 round player, suggesting that we picked him in about the right spot -- but I haven't seen anything yet that suggests we got great value or anything approaching a steal (time will tell). He seems like more of a depth signing to me -- something we can't afford with the holes we have and so few picks.

BTW, I think the Packers are having a good draft -- I really like the WR out of Fresno St. they picked up. I have a feeling that guy will be great (although having Aaron Rodgers throw the ball your way helps a lot).

punch it in
05-09-2014, 09:10 PM
I'm just saying that people are complaining that this pick was a reach at a position that they as fans don't view as a need, but the FO likely sees it an entirely different way. I think Trent Murphy was the BPA, so they took him.


I agree pass rush was a need. No doubt about it. Helps the secondary. I am not sure he was the bpa there. Sounds like he wasnt according to the espn crew.

Lotus
05-09-2014, 09:10 PM
Ask you the same thing i asked Matty. Would you have made that pick if given the honor?

Maybe. There are questions about Moses's motor but no questions about Murphy. From what I can tell Murphy is not just a football player, he's a sack machine. I like sack machines.

We can still get a good RT in the third.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum