So what if Gardner DOES stay?

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

MTK
04-05-2005, 08:21 AM
Peerless Price put up numbers because he was opposite Moulds and couldnt do anything as a number one. Moss was the number one last year. He made big plays whenever Pennington threw him the ball, the problem is Chad never threw him the ball. For whatever reason they didnt hookup often. When Chad went down, Moss' numbers went up.

I think that Moss could work out well here. I agree that Moss needs to be paired up with someoen else and isnt the type of guy that draws a double team everytime. With that said, it looks like our lineup is setup the way the Pats was last year. We have five above average receivers. We can move teh ball around, keep the defenses guessing. If you have a bunch of receivers the other team has to respect, and give moss the option to run free, hes going to make plays. THe guy is a playmaker.

I agree, Moss proved he can put up big numbers as the go to guy, he had a 1000 yard season and 10 TDs not too long ago.

TheMalcolmConnection
04-05-2005, 08:53 AM
So who WILL be the #1 when the season starts?

Redskins_P
04-05-2005, 11:05 AM
I guess that's why he consistantly stayed after practice and caught an extra 100-200 balls a day, that shitty work ethic of his. Rod Gardner isn't as bad as the media makes him look. He makes the easy balls look hard, and the hard balls look easy.


What good did that do him? He stayed after practice and caught balls after practice, but yet he still had a hard time catching balls in games? He's just too inconsistent.

SmootSmack
04-05-2005, 11:08 AM
What good did that do him? He stayed after practice and caught balls after practice, but yet he still had a hard time catching balls in games? He's just too inconsistent.

And I think ultimately that's what it comes down to, that no matter how hard he tries maybe Gardner just isn't that good.

EEich
04-05-2005, 11:34 AM
Vikings have no plans to trade for Gardner now.
http://www.startribune.com/stories/503/5329919.html

Daseal
04-05-2005, 11:39 AM
I agree, Moss proved he can put up big numbers as the go to guy, he had a 1000 yard season and 10 TDs not too long ago.

So did Gardner, but you keep blowing that off, Matty. Only difference is he had only 8 TDs.

MTK
04-05-2005, 11:48 AM
So did Gardner, but you keep blowing that off, Matty. Only difference is he had only 8 TDs.

Gardner has also had 3 very inconsistent and very unspectacular seasons.

Seems like the pro-Gardner people blow that off more often than the anti-Gardner people blow off the one 1000 yard season he had.

He had one good season out of 4. Wow, I'm really impressed, even in baseball that's a crappy percentage.

When is it time to move on? I'd say 4 seasons is more than enough time to properly evaluate a player.

Last year was a disappointment for Moss because of injuries, but he STILL had a much better season than Gardner, and he also played in a conservative offense.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
04-05-2005, 11:57 AM
i;d like to see an even up trade to the falcons,gardner for price.anybody else fancy to that?

I'd like to see it, but we can't afford Price (his contract numbers are as big as Coles') and the Falcons would never trade Price for Gardner - Price is better and the Falcons would take about a $7 million cap hit.

TheMalcolmConnection
04-05-2005, 12:02 PM
I still REALLY REALLY want the Skins to draft Williams with our first pick.

SKINZ_DOMIN8
04-05-2005, 12:08 PM
I see no reason why he wouldn't be our #1 if he stayed.

I see no reason why you shouldn't get your eyes checked out. Did you watch any games the past 3 years????????

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum