NYCskinfan82
05-06-2014, 06:50 PM
Maybe they can resign him for cheaper.
Tanard Jackson to be reinstatedNYCskinfan82 05-06-2014, 06:50 PM Maybe they can resign him for cheaper. That Guy 05-06-2014, 09:13 PM they met with him before cutting him from what i read... so no, i don't believe he's going to be resigned. Lotus 05-06-2014, 09:16 PM He was only getting about $750k. Hard to go cheaper with a vet. Dirtbag59 05-06-2014, 09:22 PM He was only getting about $750k. Hard to go cheaper with a vet. Vet Min FTMFW!!!! By the way what happened to the good old days where everyone suggested signing everyone for the vet min. CRedskinsRule 05-06-2014, 09:28 PM I say sign Dirtbag for Vet Min, and let SS go. The quality of info may not be as good, but the enjoyment factor of the site will go probowl style. NYCskinfan82 05-06-2014, 09:33 PM I say sign Dirtbag for Vet Min, and let SS go. The quality of info may not be as good, but the enjoyment factor of the site will go probowl style. LOL :laughing2 MTK 05-06-2014, 09:34 PM Two people familiar with the situation said that the termination of Jackson’s contract had nothing to do with him failing a physical. Instead, it was believed to be contract related. Both people, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that a return to the Redskins remained possible for Jackson. Redskins terminate Tanard Jackson’s contract, but could re-sign him [updated] (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/wp/2014/05/06/redskins-terminate-tanard-jacksons-contract/) RedskinRat 05-06-2014, 10:13 PM Ah, then just more contract shenanigans? I blame the attorneys and agents. NC_Skins 05-07-2014, 10:51 AM If it was a contract thing, why wait till now? Lotus 05-07-2014, 11:09 AM I wonder if TJax might not have demanded a new contract upon his reinstatement and Bruce said, "Ah, no." If so, TJax might test the FA waters and find that no one wants him more than us. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum