DeSean Jackson meeting with the Redskins on Monday

Biggest concerns: How good will he be on Madden? What number will he wear?

The meeting with RGIII is just to help him decide which number he'll switch to when he's dawning the burgundy and gold this coming season.

The meeting with RGIII is just to help him decide which number he'll switch to when he's dawning the burgundy and gold this coming season.

I like this attitude.

an OMG from the TMZ:

DeSean Jackson -- Met With RG3 In L.A. ... BEFORE Meeting with Redskins In D.C. | TMZ.com (http://www.tmz.com/2014/03/31/desean-jackson-robert-griffin-iii-rg3-redskins-meeting-los-angeles/)

Sweet baby jesus.

Biggest concerns: How good will he be on Madden? What number will he wear?

He finished with a 91 overall and 98 speed and I have been giving him 18 for us.

Guys, I have a problem. I keep checking back here obsessively in hopes I see someone say we either signed DJ or he left Redskins Park. Blaahhhhh.
To free up some time for you, he's not supposed to be at RP until this evening and no solid news likely until tomorrow mid morning at the earliest.

He finished with a 91 overall and 98 speed and I have been giving him 18 for us.

Is 81 taken? I think he might go for that. Paying Aldrick for 11?

I heard once that he chose Cal over SC because he couldn't get #1 there haha.

Is 81 taken? I think he might go for that. Paying Aldrick for 11?

I heard once that he chose Cal over SC because he couldn't get #1 there haha.

Art Monk would slap the taste buds out of your mouth for even suggesting this.

Learn your history.

Is 81 taken? I think he might go for that. Paying Aldrick for 11?

I heard once that he chose Cal over SC because he couldn't get #1 there haha.

I never give anyone 81 when I play Madden for us

Hankerson is over the 51 point, so he would save a miniscule amount, and neither he or Robinson, imo, have done anything that deserves a roster spot if our top 3 for the next 2 years are Garcon, DJax, and Roberts. Let spots 5 and 6 go to mid-late round draft choices in a deep WR draft and see if they can progress.

Even though Hankerson was a solid #2 last year before he got hurt, you really want him gone, don't you? It would be stupid to cut him before next offseason; if he gets hurt again this year, then you let him walk in FA. If he turns in a good performance, then you resign him.

I think a big reason people want Hankerson gone is because they're disappointed that he has never lived up to his draft status. However, just because someone doesn't live up to where they were drafted doesn't mean they should be cut. They can still be solid contributors that can be had at a minimal price, e.g. Hankerson. Don't let sentimentalism dictate who should be cut and who should stay.