Fred Davis Bye Bye

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13

Alvin Walton
01-27-2014, 09:03 PM
This thread makes me want to eat Fruit Loops right out of the box.

Stacks42
01-28-2014, 09:53 AM
Fred was already in the NFL drug program, which means he was subject to random testing throughout the year.

If you aren't in the program, there is a window in April May I think where you know you are subject to being tested.


Didn't FD and TW both get busted during the lockout? I don't even think the first positive test should have applied since they were "unemployed" at the time. Still he is an idiot! My friends used to sell large amounts to the Skins secondary (some of whom are in the superbowl this weekend) and I could never understand it. Why smoke when you are in a speed/skill position, especially since the career window is so small?

Monkeydad
01-28-2014, 10:35 AM
Didn't FD and TW both get busted during the lockout? I don't even think the first positive test should have applied since they were "unemployed" at the time. Still he is an idiot! My friends used to sell large amounts to the Skins secondary (some of whom are in the superbowl this weekend) and I could never understand it. Why smoke when you are in a speed/skill position, especially since the career window is so small?

The salary cap "violations" were also during an uncapped year. This doesn't matter to the league, especially when the Redskins are involved.


Some NFL folks use weed for its pain- and stress-reducing properties, so they wouldn't want to wait until they retire.

At least at first it is not random testing, there's a defined window of time during which testing happens. So what I don't understand is why he couldn't chill for a few weeks until the testers had finished their job. That's what many NFLers do.

They can afford doctors and legitimate pain remedies that won't give them lung cancer on top of the legal issues.

That's no excuse.

over the mountain
01-28-2014, 03:27 PM
i thought sleepy and silverback got punished bc they both tested positive after the NFL gave players a grace period to stop smoking and clear out their piss.

they were 2 of only 3 in the league that couldnt stop smoking weed after the CBA was signed.

EARTHQUAKE2689
01-28-2014, 03:34 PM
Weed causes Lung Cancer? Since when? I don't remember that being on the box.

Lotus
01-28-2014, 03:37 PM
The salary cap "violations" were also during an uncapped year. This doesn't matter to the league, especially when the Redskins are involved.




They can afford doctors and legitimate pain remedies that won't give them lung cancer on top of the legal issues.

That's no excuse.

Marijuana is a "legitimate" pain killer, as cultures across the globe have known for centuries.

If you smoke it through a water pipe or vaporizer, the harmful compounds which can lead to lung cancer are filtered out.

And the prescription meds which you tout often have bad side-effects or are physically addictive, unlike marijuana.

MTK
01-28-2014, 03:42 PM
Better to smoke some weed vs getting hooked on Rx pain killers.

Chico23231
01-28-2014, 03:58 PM
Marijuana is a "legitimate" pain killer, as cultures across the globe have known for centuries.

If you smoke it through a water pipe or vaporizer, the harmful compounds which can lead to lung cancer are filtered out.

And the prescription meds which you tout often have bad side-effects or are physically addictive, unlike marijuana.

And Pain Killers, do just that, kill, unlike tweeds.

HailGreen28
01-28-2014, 04:18 PM
So now weed isn't addictive? Then why can't some players stop smoking it the 3-5 years they're likely to be in the league? Especially after they've been caught once?

MTK
01-28-2014, 04:21 PM
So now weed isn't addictive? Then why can't some players stop smoking it the 3-5 years they're likely to be in the league? Especially after they've been caught once?

No, it's really not. Not physically at least. And nowhere nearly as addictive as other substances out there.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum