2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Pages : [1] 2 3 4

NC_Skins
01-13-2014, 11:44 PM
Our line was much better than what people gave them credit for.


3. Washington Redskins (16th)
PB: 4th, RB: 8th, PEN: 3rd

Stud: An All-Pro-(or at least second team)-like performance from Trent Williams (+38.3). He has moments that make you smack your head, but by and large he’ll slow down elite pass rushers and has the kind of athleticism that generates movement whatever scheme you’re running.

Dud: Too many bad days for Chris Chester (-5.5) who continues to baffle with his streaky play.

Analysis: This ranking won’t please many Redskins fans who see the line as the route of their problems. The truth is the Shanahans had the zone blocking scheme working perfectly with there regularly huge cutback lanes for their backs to work with. Much is made of the hits Robert Griffin III took as if every single one of them must be the responsibility of the line. Well RG3 himself was charged with 10 of those sacks (more than any other player on the team) as the team gave whoever was quarterback ample time to get the job done. The big question now is what Jay Gruden intends for this line and whether he’ll move to a more power based scheme that could put a number of jobs on the line.


Your QBs (both of them) can't hold the ball as long as they did and not expect to get sacked. Robert and Kirk were responsible for a good deal of those sacks this year and I'm not the only one that noticed this.

skinsfaninok
01-13-2014, 11:47 PM
We have a top 3 LT and usually that means u have a solid line to begin with. Thanks for the stat

Bucket
01-14-2014, 02:37 AM
Yeah, running 2 WR routes didn't have anything to do with holding the ball to long either.

A lot more involved in holding the ball then just the QB. Not saying they didn't. Just saying it wasn't always them.

donofriose
01-14-2014, 07:45 AM
QB sucked
WRs as a whole sucker
OL sucked.

Team is 3-13.

WillH
01-14-2014, 09:16 AM
I'm sorry, I don't buy it. I mean I agree that fG3 held the ball too long on some plays, but more often then not the pocket would collapse immediately, or never form at all.

NC_Skins
01-14-2014, 09:57 AM
Yeah, running 2 WR routes didn't have anything to do with holding the ball to long either.

A lot more involved in holding the ball then just the QB. Not saying they didn't. Just saying it wasn't always them.


..or a QB that scanned only 1/2 of the field. Some professionals analyzed game tape, and even cooley said this about him.

Chico23231
01-14-2014, 09:59 AM
Rankings or not the Oline never seemed in unison working as a group. Seemed like a serious lack of chemistry, so aside from the individual rankings, as a whole they struggled especially in pass protection.

Polumbus and Chester need to go now. I think Monty's time at center should be up as well.

jamf
01-14-2014, 10:10 AM
what a bullshit ranking.

The Redskins did everything they can scheme wise to limit Oline problems by pretty much only using 3 step drops and 2 WR routes and leaving 7 to block.

If this line was really a top ranked line, the QB would take 7 step drops which would let the WR's get down feel and create lanes for big plays. You don't get big plays from quick dump passes and it shows.

Ruhskins
01-14-2014, 11:00 AM
At the end of the day, it seemed that no defense respected this line and RG3 didn't trust it. I'm sure RG3 and Cousins were guilty of a number of sacks, but it is hard to consider them a top ranked o-line when you constantly saw just about every lineman (except TW) get bulldozed by the opponent's d-line.

mredskins
01-14-2014, 11:14 AM
It is going tbe interesting to see if Alfmo is good because of Alfmo or MS's zone blocking next year.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum