Another school Shooting Nevada

Can we get a list of regimes? Oh, and could you also list the regimes getting their weapons elsewhere? Maybe throw in the organization deciding who's repressive and what constitutes repression? Is the U.S. listed yet?

You sound an awful lot like my biological father. He is a fundmaental baptist.:silly:

You sound an awful lot like my biological father. He is a fundmaental baptist.:silly:

We were probably separated at birth.

When someone makes a glaringly rhetorical all-encompassing statement I like a few facts to be included. That's generally enough of a request to flush their argument away.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

If you are going to post an article you should probably read it first.

It was 3 young adults wounded with non life threatening wounds. And it was allegedly related to a drug deal gone bad a week or so prior.

When the facts are represented it has a little different tone than, more dead kids again.


1) It's at a high school ,while school was in .17 and 16 year olds are still kids.
2) there was no mention of a "drug deal gone bad" in the link
3) ...so because the shooter or shooters only grazed the victims it doesn't really count ,wow.

....you and RR are typical gun nuts ,spin, spin, spin.

1)
<SNIP>
....you and RR are typical gun nuts ,spin, spin, spin.

You and Lotus should start a drum circle, attract some peace loving Sasquatch.

You both lie to further the agenda. Momma State will protect you.


Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

You and Lotus should start a drum circle, attract some peace loving Sasquatch.

You both lie to further the agenda. Momma State will protect you.


Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk


LOL , NRA rule #101 , when spin doesn't work attack and call them liars .

1) It's at a high school ,while school was in .17 and 16 year olds are still kids.
2) there was no mention of a "drug deal gone bad" in the link
3) ...so because the shooter or shooters only grazed the victims it doesn't really count ,wow.

....you and RR are typical gun nuts ,spin, spin, spin.

Just because you read one article that is written with an agenda doesn't mean that's what's going on. The sad and unfortunate truth is you really can't believe anything you read in the news anymore. If you read a few different articles you get a view of the bigger picture.

LOL , NRA rule #101 , when spin doesn't work attack and call them liars .

If you tell lies I'll call you on it, NRA affiliation notwithstanding.

To represent a group of gun deaths as 'children' when the overwhelming majority are gang-bangers would be laughable, if not for the seriousness of the topic.

From the CDC/FBI figures I've been able to separate out it's 0.2% kids under 10 years old, attributable to accidents exacerbated by piss-poor gun safety (i.e. not securing and restricting access to the weapon), the vast majority of the remainder are primarily in the 14-19 age group and are gang related. This totally skews the data and misrepresents the societal cause.

If you are going to post an article you should probably read it first.

It was 3 young adults wounded with non life threatening wounds. And it was allegedly related to a drug deal gone bad a week or so prior.

When the facts are represented it has a little different tone than, more dead kids again.

All of them were minors, under 18 years old. That makes them kids. To be an adult, "young" or not, requires being at least age 18.

The tv news wrongly told me of fatalities, so I will edit my remarks: "More kids shot."

So there you go, everyone is now happy: More Kids Shot.

So there you go, everyone is now happy: More Kids Shot.

In the same way that religious adherents that kill in the name of their god are just devout.

Keep the lies and half-truths coming, it gets more amusing each time.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Keep the lies and half-truths coming, it gets more amusing each time.



I expect as much from a NRA devotee