smoot's ranking

"In summary, we think Smoot has been overrated. Maybe not to Champ Bailey levels (another ex-Redskins cornerback, perhaps that's the key)", http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com.

Does Don Banks know what he's talking about? I always thought Smoot was very physical, what do you think? If you read the artical he says he has good coverage skills but ranks him last among FA cornerbacks.

I didn't think much of him untill half way through the 2003 season when he played with a bruised sternum. IMO 2004 was when he really started looking like a solid corner. Anyways, he's gone and I'm glad we didn't overpay for him.

He used to tackle like a matador, now we think he's better because he was always reminding us. Him and Springs really attacked the run last year though.

smoot didnt press in coverage a lot i dont think, maybe thats what he means. i remember smoot always giving a huge cushion.

I think he was a good corner, physical enough. The problem is, we don't have anybody to fill his shoes.

I would actually take Springs over Smoot even considering his age.

I would actually take Springs over Smoot even considering his age.
Didnt springs have a better year last year? Even though it did seem apparent that Smootie was willing to parcipated in tackling for once.

I've seen Lucas play. He is nothing special. Smoot is a good player but lets face it, big receivers would eat him for lunch.

I give Smoot full marks for heart but a WR like Owens just runs through him. Then Owens gets to Taylor and it's 'Lay down' time.

I give Smoot full marks for heart but a WR like Owens just runs through him. Then Owens gets to Taylor and it's 'Lay down' time.I thought Smoot and springs did a good jod against Owens last year. First game two catches for 24 yards 1 TD. Second 6 catches 47 yards no Tds and one lost fumble. That sound like numbers with Brunell at QB. LOL