Based on this article in SI it sure looks like this scenario will play out.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/don_banks/03/16/labor.notes/index.html
SmootSmack
03-16-2005, 11:52 PM
This is interesting stuff, and someone should post a reply so I might as well be the first...
I have nothing to say. Need to read more about the situation but I just can't see them going to an uncapped year. There's no turning back after that
Monksdown
03-16-2005, 11:54 PM
I would love to comment on the article, as it appeared to be interesting. But after 10 PM, my ADD really kicks in, and I realize that i cant see more than 6 months into the future.
sportscurmudgeon
03-16-2005, 11:57 PM
The NFLPA had an "uncapped situation" as soon as the Federal Judge ruled that the NFL "limited free agency" was illegal. The NFLPA negotiated away that status in favor of the cap situation. People need to go back and read that last sentence one more time so they might understand the history of the salary cap that exists now.
It is rhetorical flourish to say that if the NFL "ever went uncapped" there is no turning back. They turned back once before and they can do it again.
There IS a Redskin danger here. Given the propsect of an uncapped year, imagine the spending binge that Danny Boy will undertake. Then they will need to conform to a cap. Can you say "Salary Cap Hell"?
BrudLee
03-17-2005, 12:03 AM
There IS a Redskin danger here. Given the propsect of an uncapped year, imagine the spending binge that Danny Boy will undertake. Then they will need to conform to a cap. Can you say "Salary Cap Hell"?
I can picture some interesting contracts, actually.
LDS: We'll pay you $50 million this year, thoughwe'll be deferring most of that, and league minimum for the next seven years. What do you say?
SmootSmack
03-17-2005, 01:17 AM
It is rhetorical flourish to say that if the NFL "ever went uncapped" there is no turning back. They turned back once before and they can do it again.
Yeah, well...maybe I was going for "rhetorical flourish". Didn't think about that, now did you?
Curmudgeon, I'm guessing what you were referring to was Plan B Free Agency right? But I must say I didn't realize that there was a cap before then. I thought the cap came after the judge ruled Plan B illegal
saden1
03-17-2005, 01:36 AM
From the article:
The union wants the players' salary cap based on teams' total football revenues, rather than the current system
Are they fucking serious? The whole reason the cap exists is to level the playing field. 64% of Redskins revenue is 156.8 million (245 million * 0.64). 64% of Arizona Cardinal's revenue is 83.84 million (131 million * 0.64). This seems like a disastrous idea to me. I'd rather there be NFL labor stoppage.
Forbes : NFL Revenues (http://www.forbes.com/lists/results.jhtml?passListId=30&passYear=2004&passListType=Misc&searchParameter1=unset&searchParameter2=unset&resultsStart=1&resultsHowMany=32&resultsSortProperties=%2Bnumberfield1%2C%2Bstringf ield1&resultsSortCategoryName=Rank&category1=category&category2=category&passKeyword=)
saden1
03-17-2005, 01:42 AM
Or maybe the want to add up the total teams' revenue and then divide that number by 32 teams and then multiply that number by 64%. If this is what they want then the salary cap would jump to 106.6 million (5330 billion / 32 * 0.64) based on current figures.
offiss
03-17-2005, 01:52 AM
From the article:
Are they fucking serious? The whole reason the cap exists is to level the playing field. 64% of Redskins revenue is 156.8 million (245 million * 0.64). 64% of Arizona Cardinal's revenue is 83.84 million (131 million * 0.64). This seems like a disastrous idea to me. I'd rather there be NFL labor stoppage.
Forbes : NFL Revenues (http://www.forbes.com/lists/results.jhtml?passListId=30&passYear=2004&passListType=Misc&searchParameter1=unset&searchParameter2=unset&resultsStart=1&resultsHowMany=32&resultsSortProperties=%2Bnumberfield1%2C%2Bstringf ield1&resultsSortCategoryName=Rank&category1=category&category2=category&passKeyword=)
I hope they strike, if they do I will bet the farm we win the SB!
2-0 in strike year's baby!:headbange
bedlamVR
03-17-2005, 02:30 AM
Any huge increase like what the PFA are looking for will just cause more problems . There are two caps in football the calculated salary cap enforced by the NFL and then the actual amount of money teams can afford to pay out . This would lead to a situation of a splitting fo the teams between the haves and have nots .