Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

CultBrennan59
08-29-2013, 12:12 AM
I like flying way under the radar and then surprise all the doubters. Who cares what this clown thinks, we know what we got.

I think we are top 10 on this list, best case #6. But #20? No. Thats an awful ranking.

That Guy
08-29-2013, 12:24 AM
this is either a troll or a joke.

has to be. #1 in rushing, #5 overall offense, but #19 in backfield talent? (#2-5 are ranked ahead of us)

seems strange, no?

The Goat
08-29-2013, 01:48 AM
Bizarre ranking and article as it pertains to the best rushing attack in 2012. You can almost argue it'll be even better because we didn't have a healthy helu last season.

Whatever. Wins are what matter and this franchise appears to have cracked that code. To hell with the media.

JoeRedskin
08-29-2013, 06:30 AM
Joe Redskin talked to the author about it and some of his thinking. JR want to fill them in?

Actually, that was someone else. I never got his response to my initial comment. Then saw yours. Had to go back to his feed to see conversation. Not sure how I got left out of the loop.

Essentially, he did not consider Morris w/out Shanahan & RGIII to be a top 10 back. Thought even more ranked higher than Helu. As Smootsmack pointed out, he simply didn't credit Helu for his 2011 efforts and really didn't seem to value Young very much. Admitted that he may have ranked TB high with Leonard as a back up.

CRedskinsRule
08-29-2013, 07:02 AM
Actually, that was someone else. I never got his response to my initial comment. Then saw yours. Had to go back to his feed to see conversation. Not sure how I got left out of the loop.

Essentially, he did not consider Morris w/out Shanahan & RGIII to be a top 10 back. Thought even more ranked higher than Helu. As Smootsmack pointed out, he simply didn't credit Helu for his 2011 efforts and really didn't seem to value Young very much. Admitted that he may have ranked TB high with Leonard as a back up.
It seems like the Skins offense gives all doubters excuses. If you want to doubt Griffin, he only succeeded because of Morris and the scheme. If you want to doubt Morris, well then he only succeeded because of Griffin and the scheme. If you want to doubt the scheme, well then it only worked because two good rookies were running it but this year it will be figured out.

I can't wait to see the Skins demonstrate that it all works because all three elements are just that damn good.

JoeRedskin
08-29-2013, 08:20 AM
^^ Agreed. Of the three (Griffin, Morris, scheme), however, I think the that Morris gets the least credit or is the most undervalued. Griffin may be seen to benefit from the scheme but even the doubters acknowledge he is a unique talent. Plus, there is this perception that Shanny's scheme produces 1000 yard at the drop of a hat. While true to some extent, the Terrell Davis likely would have succeeded in any offense - not just Shanny's.

Morris is a 1200 yard back in any system. He led the league in yards after contact and in runs of 10 yards or more. Yet, he is constantly overlooked b/c he is in a Shanahan offense and has a stellar QB threat. On top of that, his personality is such that he simply does not seek this kind of attention.

The more I watch him and read up on analysis by folks who break down tape, the more I am convinced that he is a truly special back - vision, quickness, power and instinct. He is the real deal and far, far better than the talking heads (or anyone outside of Washington) realize. He is in the league of an Arian Foster and certainly better than Gore or Ridley (no disrespect to them, they are good backs - Morris is just better).

Really, other than AP, I would argue AlMo is as good or better than any other back in the league - in any system - but has the good fortune of being in a system perfectly suited for him.

Chico23231
08-29-2013, 08:58 AM
this is either a troll or a joke.

has to be. #1 in rushing, #5 overall offense, but #19 in backfield talent? (#2-5 are ranked ahead of us)

seems strange, no?

nail on the head. Scheme, potential and subjective opinion...f*ck facts. These rankings articles are one big f*cking joke.

Most on this board have enough knowledge to come up with a list that makes more sense than this one. Or is sports illustrated trying to compete with bleacher report and their mindless list articles written by no talent "journalist?" It seems anybody can be one of those these days.

KI Skins Fan
08-29-2013, 09:29 AM
Any rankings need to start with production.

Lotus
08-29-2013, 09:42 AM
It's all good. No one from SI will be on the field against Philly...but Alfmo will be. :silly:

Hog1
08-29-2013, 10:50 AM
It's all good. No one from SI will be on the field against Philly...but Alfmo will be. :silly:
You mean....the 2nd ranked running back in 2012?
The one on the worst running attack in the NFL?
......got it

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum