Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)

I didn't bring him back up. He was referenced as an answer to you over 31 bust out question. Randy Moss come to mind after sub par seasons with the Raiders. And yea pretty darn good and pretty good are one in the same just to clarify.

From What Does History Say About Investing in Receivers Entering Their 30s? | Bleacher Report (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1550869-what-does-history-say-about-investing-in-receivers-entering-their-30s) below

Devery Henderson and Brian Hartline, all under 30, should get some play on the open market. While none of them is a true No. 1 wide receiver, they will produce at a higher level for a longer period of time than Jennings and Welker.

Now go argue with someone else. Like some nagging schoolgirl.

Nobody is nagging or arguing with you. Nor is anyone giggling at you.

If you can't have a discussion with someone that disagrees with you maybe a discussion board isn't for you.

No need to get so defensive when someone challenges your position. This is what we do around here.

Nobody is nagging or arguing with you. Nor is anyone giggling at you.

If you can't have a discussion with someone that disagrees with you maybe a discussion board isn't for you.

No need to get so defensive when someone challenges your position. This is what we do around here.

Honest debate I love. Arguing because you are ill at me about previous Thrash talk and want to pick something else to argue about because of the poster is totally different. I guarantee that if you had said what I said you would have got no such response from Smoot or anyone else. Guaranteed.

It wasn't a "I don't think Henderson can get it done here" but more of an argument towards the poster than the topic. Let's be honest here and not hide behind "challenging your position" nonsense. When the debate is an honest one you will here no worrisome comments from me. Why would I get mad if someone doesn't think Henderson can get it done. Clearly I wouldn't. It's how it is said rather than what is said. If you don't like me then just say so and not hide behind if you challenge my position I get mad nonsense. It seems personal with you and Smoot. Not the topic.

Be honest and just kick me off the board rather than disingenuous debate. We know the score. We've been at it before. Not once have we ever agreed and I remember it being ugly before. So let's not say it is the topic anymore. Do what you must.

If you don't like me then just say so


I don't like you. LOL.

No, really though, I sort of agree with you about James Thrash. He was a good receiver. Nowhere near HOF quality, but he had a respectable career.

Lock it.

I don't like you. LOL.

No, really though, I sort of agree with you about James Thrash. He was a good receiver. Nowhere near HOF quality, but he had a respectable career.

Very cool.

Honest debate I love. Arguing because you are ill at me about previous Thrash talk and want to pick something else to argue about because of the poster is totally different. I guarantee that if you had said what I said you would have got no such response from Smoot or anyone else. Guaranteed.

It wasn't a "I don't think Henderson can get it done here" but more of an argument towards the poster than the topic. Let's be honest here and not hide behind "challenging your position" nonsense. When the debate is an honest one you will here no worrisome comments from me. Why would I get mad if someone doesn't think Henderson can get it done. Clearly I wouldn't. It's how it is said rather than what is said. If you don't like me then just say so and not hide behind if you challenge my position I get mad nonsense. It seems personal with you and Smoot. Not the topic.

Be honest and just kick me off the board rather than disingenuous debate. We know the score. We've been at it before. Not once have we ever agreed and I remember it being ugly before. So let's not say it is the topic anymore. Do what you must.

I really have no idea what you're talking about.

Nothing about my posts with you have been personal. Before yesterday I really had no idea who you are. I don't keep score when it comes to discussions.

Feel free to leave if you want. Or just chill and don't take things so personal.

I would be willing to bet serious money that neither Henderson nor Stallworth are going to "bust out" (per SS's definition) this year. In fact, I would be mildly surprised if both make the roster. Looking at the WR corp and depending on how many we keep, I think one of them has a pretty good shot to be that 5th or 6th "insurance" WR who is only active in injury situations. As I recall, Stallworth played some ST for in his last stint and, if he is willing to do so again, that might give him a leg up.

I can see our top 5 from last year returning w/ possibly Briscoe being cut in favor of Henderson/Stallworth and then one of the UFA guys (I'm specifically thinking of L. Lewis) making the final cut.

Again, such a nice change from a couple of years ago when we had no depth.

A thoughtful post.

I really have no idea what you're talking about.

Nothing about my posts with you have been personal. Before yesterday I really had no idea who you are. I don't keep score when it comes to discussions.

Feel free to leave if you want. Or just chill and don't take things so personal.



Yea OK I'll not mention the Laron Landry back and forth we had and others but who am I to know what you remember and don't. I don't take things personal unless they are.

Need to Know: Meriweather a key in 2013 - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins (http://www.realredskins.com/rich-tandlers-real-redsk/2013/06/need-to-know-meriweather-a-key-in-2013.html)

Meriweather will add tons of talent to the secondary. If only he can stay healthy this season.

Honest debate I love. Arguing because you are ill at me about previous Thrash talk and want to pick something else to argue about because of the poster is totally different. I guarantee that if you had said what I said you would have got no such response from Smoot or anyone else. Guaranteed.

It wasn't a "I don't think Henderson can get it done here" but more of an argument towards the poster than the topic. Let's be honest here and not hide behind "challenging your position" nonsense. When the debate is an honest one you will here no worrisome comments from me. Why would I get mad if someone doesn't think Henderson can get it done. Clearly I wouldn't. It's how it is said rather than what is said. If you don't like me then just say so and not hide behind if you challenge my position I get mad nonsense. It seems personal with you and Smoot. Not the topic.

Be honest and just kick me off the board rather than disingenuous debate. We know the score. We've been at it before. Not once have we ever agreed and I remember it being ugly before. So let's not say it is the topic anymore. Do what you must.

it's nothing personal from my end. I don't see how asking how many WRs really "bust out" is some sort of personal attack.