firstdown
06-11-2013, 10:13 AM
You completely missed the point
Well I guess I also missed the point. Those were not my words they were from the article. Dumb ass.
"Unwanted sexual contact is everything from somebody looking at you sideways when they shouldn't to someone pushing you up against the wall and brutally raping you," said Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, a former sex crimes prosecutor.
firstdown
06-11-2013, 10:18 AM
Big difference between sexual ASSAULT and sexual harassment, FD.
If anyone of you decided to actually read the article that started the thread they did not separate the two in their count in 2012.
CRedskinsRule
06-11-2013, 10:26 AM
Well I guess I also missed the point. Those were not my words they were from the article. Dumb ass.
"Unwanted sexual contact is everything from somebody looking at you sideways when they shouldn't to someone pushing you up against the wall and brutally raping you," said Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, a former sex crimes prosecutor.
If you don't take it out of context, you see that the Democratic senator was faulting the military for not separating it out:
A study the Defense Department released in May estimated that cases of unwanted sexual contact in the military, from groping to rape, rose 37 percent in 2012, to about 26,000 cases, from 19,000 the previous year.
Lawmakers scorned top brass for failing to break down that data.
"Unwanted sexual contact is everything from somebody looking at you sideways when they shouldn't to someone pushing you up against the wall and brutally raping you," said Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, a former sex crimes prosecutor.
In other words, the military was trying to lump big cases with small in order to minimize the issue.
firstdown
06-11-2013, 02:23 PM
If you don't take it out of context, you see that the Democratic senator was faulting the military for not separating it out:
In other words, the military was trying to lump big cases with small in order to minimize the issue.
I know that was my point as to why the problem seems so bad and the numbers so high. Seems people that have a problem with what I was saying did not read the article and had no idea what I was talking about.
firstdown
06-11-2013, 02:29 PM
Big difference between sexual ASSAULT and sexual harassment, FD.
If you read the article you would know they didn't separat the two in their numbers like I was saying.
firstdown
06-11-2013, 02:31 PM
If you don't take it out of context, you see that the Democratic senator was faulting the military for not separating it out:
In other words, the military was trying to lump big cases with small in order to minimize the issue.
Adding them together would minimize? I would think removing the minor stuff would minimize the numbers.
CRedskinsRule
06-11-2013, 02:35 PM
Adding them together would minimize? I would think removing the minor stuff would minimize the numbers.
Except that like you were trying to do - claiming a verbal assault is lumped in with the more serious stuff thus saying it's just college kids doing what they do.
SmootSmack
06-11-2013, 03:44 PM
Adding them together would minimize? I would think removing the minor stuff would minimize the numbers.
Minimize the issue is what he said, not minimize the numbers
NC_Skins
06-11-2013, 04:44 PM
When in doubt cry about the "Constitution" weather it has anything to do with the argument or not.
I'm just speechless at the stupidity of this statement. There is a reason our government is put in check. There is a reason why they are required to have warrants to obtain confiscate, inspect or search your property. The Constitution has everything to do with it.
People like you are screaming about right to privacy show me where it says you right to privacy can be the cause for innocent American citizens to be murdered by terrorist?
Another stupid ass statement. My right to privacy can be the cause for innocent American citizens to be murdered by terrorist? Are you a Fox News listener by chance? That sounds like garbage being fed by a bunch of fear mongering media outlets. They want you to be scared. Why? Scared people will give up anything to feel "protected". Also, how is not invading my privacy causing innocent Americans to die?
Republicans and Democrats alike have a greed the program is (was) working, like it or not the American public does not have the "right" to know everything that goes on to protect them.
This means what to me? Have you seen the state of our country? So if both parties are agreeing with it, chances are it's definitely something we shouldn't be doing. That said, even the guy that created the Patriot Act is questioning this. Hey, the dumbass should have thought of that when it was brought up.
The actual breakdown on who voted for the renewal of the Patriot Act. I thought the GOP were suppposed to be staunch supporters of the Constitution? I guess that only applies to gun laws since they are getting NRA funds.
Congressional Bills and Votes - NYTimes.com (http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/senate/1/84)
Here you have the head of the NSA outright lying to a Congressman about the NSA collecting data.
T9ss2_0emOY
...and you want me to put my trust and faith in those assholes? Nevertheless the assholes in Congress.
You sir are naive as hell. I'll leave you with this quote from a man much smarter than you, me or anybody in our current government.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin
firstdown
06-12-2013, 09:33 AM
Except that like you were trying to do - claiming a verbal assault is lumped in with the more serious stuff thus saying it's just college kids doing what they do.
I'm not trying to do that its the military that lumped them together. What's so hard to under stand here. I agree its a serious issue I'm, just saying the number is way over inflated because they have lumped everything together. Do you think that in 2012 the military actually had 26,000 sexual assults?