Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Most definitely. A lot of people are waaay too pessimistic. We HAVE seen signs of greatness out of Ramsey. I definitely think he has it in him and with an upgraded line and WR corps, I think this might be his breakout year.

Ramsey does NOT need to complete 60% in a Gibbs offense. In '87, the year we won with Doug Williams, he only completed somewhere around 56%, and in '91, Mark Rypien hit 59%, made the Pro Bowl, and got Super Bowl MVP. I know it's a new era of football with new expectations, but I don't think a guy needs to hit 60% to do well. We just need to hit the necessary throws on third down and get the deep ball when opponents stack for the run.

Exactly, AND the playcalling will be a bit more aggresive this year too.

Ramsey does not need to comlete 100% of his passes he does not need to complete 30% of his passes. He does not need to throw more than 20 TD's or less than 10 INT's. Rating Schmating. Patrick Ramsey needs to go 4-2 against the NFC East, 3-1 against the NFC West, and 3-1 against the AFC West. And beat either Chicago or Tampa. However his numbers look after that is ok with me.

yeah we were horrible on third down last year. with an upgraded o line, a nasty defense that will be even nastier with lavar back, okay special teams (im still feeling the loss when we let baltimore win the game by that punt return, and when we could've had a shutout of new york if we didn't give up that kick return), and c.p. we will easily make the playoffs. how about portis's numbers. i see him getting around 1800 yards if he's healthy, and about 15 rushing touchdowns. portis would've had 1500 yards last year if it wasn't for those games where he had like 55 yards, 17 yards, etc.

I'm also excited to see a rejuvenated line to be able to open the running game up (and passing game).

hey drago, who do you think we will lose against in the nfc east, the nfc west, and against the afc west? i think we could easily beat philadelphia,(lets not forget how close we came last year, until ramsey threw that int), we can easily beat st. louis(they have lost easy games last year), and if you think we are gonna lose to the raiders in the afc west you are mightily mistaken cuz even with randy moss they still won't win(look back to our game against the vikes last year).

:biggthump 16-0 baby.

hey drago, who do you think we will lose against in the nfc east, the nfc west, and against the afc west? i think we could easily beat philadelphia,(lets not forget how close we came last year, until ramsey threw that int), we can easily beat st. louis(they have lost easy games last year), and if you think we are gonna lose to the raiders in the afc west you are mightily mistaken cuz even with randy moss they still won't win(look back to our game against the vikes last year).

I think we can beat NYG twice they don't impress or scare me. Philly is beatable and that's why we'll split with them. Dallas is extremely beatable for everyone in the league but us so we'll split with them. In the AFC West, I think we have everyone handled except KC. They still have Holmes and a pretty goob QB in Green(Ex-Redskin). The NFC west is tricky. If we lose to San Fran or Ariz we don't deserve 10-6 anyway, but STL and Seattle are dangerous when the want to be. Even if we lose to both Tampa and Chicago that still puts us at 10-6 with good AFC and NFC and Div. records. We cannot, under and circumstances, get swept by any of thes divisions.

Exactly. For some reason, it still blows my mind that KC is ANY good.