Patrick Ramsey better be Ready!!!!!

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

monk81
03-10-2005, 07:30 PM
no, but i think we will have better pass protection because the line will look like this. samuels, dockery, rabach, thomas, jansen. it will be an upgrade from last year. last year it looked like this. samuels, dockery, raymer, thomas, and ray brown filling in for jansen. we had a lot of injuries on the o line last year.

I was thinking the same thing Mooby.........a healthy Jansen will upgrade the line, as well as our new center. Our receivers our decent enough, remember we have Portis.....we don't have to have our offense looke like the Indianapolis Colts with bombs away.....just a nice balanced offense, with some throws DOWN THE FIELD..........that would be sweet! :coach:

jdlea
03-10-2005, 07:39 PM
I hope the line is better, I just don't know.

On another note, Hasselbeck sucks and will never have a hell of a year.

steveo395
03-10-2005, 07:41 PM
hasselbeck doesnt suck he's just too inconsistent

Big C
03-10-2005, 08:34 PM
passing for 2200 yards is very, very, very few for a starter...id say around 3k if he plays all the games

Schneed10
03-10-2005, 09:17 PM
2800 yards, 19 TDs, 17 INTs, 59% completion, 80 QB Rating.

I think he's a sturdy kid and can make it all 16 games, but the fact of the matter is hardly any QBs in the league play in every single game. I'll figure he plays 14 games and puts up 2800 yards, which works out to 200 per game. Gibbs' offense is still conservative, but 200 a game will be a slight step up from Ramsey's pace last year, which is reflective of the speedy receivers and going deep a bit more often.

On the TDs, I see him stepping it up a bit to 19 TDs in 14 games. I think he found a rapport with Cooley in the red zone at the end of last year which will continue, and I think Santana Moss will add some homerun capability that Coles didn't provide with his bum toe.

On the completion percentage, last year he was at 62%. I think if they're going to go deep a bit more, the completion % drops a bit to 59%.

Interceptions, last year he had 11 INTs. But remember, 3 of those were in that game where he came in and tried to dig the Redskins out of a hole when Brunell got hurt. I think it was against the Giants? In his 7 starts he had 8 INTs. So this season I say that trend continues, 17 INTs in 14 games.

Last season his QB rating was 74, with that horrible Giants game dragging it down. In his starts, it was better, I think around 80 or so. I'll go with that 80 figure, but if he can hit on some homerun passes to Moss & Patten, and still manage to keep the INTs down, I could see him getting up to a 90 rating.

I don't see him making the pro bowl, but if he can play like I describe above, and Portis has a good year, I think that's good enough to go to the playoffs.

e16bball
03-10-2005, 09:33 PM
I really don't think the original projections by wewhite are too far off what I am expecting. A passer rating of 85.0 would have been basically middle of the road in the NFL and not unlike what he posted in his starts last year. 24 TDs is a fair amount, especially in a run-based offense, but its possible. 9 INTS is kind of few, but also possible. I think something like 21 TDs and 12 INTs is very reasonable. 3000 yards is also easily attainable if he plays all 16 games.

e16bball
03-10-2005, 09:36 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that he should complete at least 60% of his passes in this offense.

heybigstar
03-10-2005, 09:44 PM
I see the Skins surprising everybody behind the underrated wr corp, ST and the nasty D, and Ramsey the gun slinger...

SmootSmack
03-10-2005, 10:02 PM
heybigstar, might be time to change that sig

Riggo44
03-10-2005, 10:08 PM
I think Ramsey is going to have a great year in 2005. With Jansen back and a year under his belt with Gibbs Ramsey should be primed and ready to go. :lol:

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum