Pics For Sharing & Debating

Don't you have a Sasquatch to litter train?

The wiretapping is about control, not safety.

Now please change your avatar.

http://ccs.dogpile.com/ClickHandler.ashx?du=http%3a%2f%2fi1.cpcache.com%2 fproduct%2f644610100%2fsasquatch_hunter_white_on_b lack_35_button.jpg%3fheight%3d460%26width%3d460%26 qv%3d90&ru=http%3a%2f%2fi1.cpcache.com%2fproduct%2f6446101 00%2fsasquatch_hunter_white_on_black_35_button.jpg %3fheight%3d460%26width%3d460%26qv%3d90&ld=20140130&ap=21&app=1&c=info.dogpl.t11.2&s=dogpile&coi=772&cop=main-title&euip=99.191.142.138&npp=21&p=0&pp=0&pvaid=3a1197c9c2f04dd9ac5347b32e6349e5&sid=1830193568.3408995137884.1391050538&vid=1830193568.3408995137884.1389930284.33&fcoi=417&fcop=topnav&fct.uid=8c3af7230c6e4b108e51b43d858ebfbb&fpid=27&ep=21&mid=9&en=0WEFU%2fZhSoS7kaUiU2lNGYn01JVzk2W%2fvS%2fYgMf%2 bZu%2fRnximHFREsA%3d%3d&hash=90166BD23B640767986D53D29EB8599D

Your stupid sasquatch comments have no effect on me. I am neither a bigfoot hunter nor a bigfoot believer. I said as much here.

You continue to misconstrue my original comments, which were about scientific method. But since you have argued that science needs no evidence, no one here should be surprised that you continue to not know what science really is.

You totally missed the point. Everything you listed is not about one man's personal gain. Nixon's wiretapping was.


What they are doing is 1,000,000 times worse. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't blackmailing congressmen either. Didn't Hoover do this exact same shit?

What they are doing is 1,000,000 times worse. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't blackmailing congressmen either. Didn't Hoover do this exact same shit?

I already said it was a bad policy so your argument above is pointless.

You're still missing the point: what Nixon did and what Clinton, Bush, and Obama have done are not remotely the same in terms of context.

You totally missed the point. Everything you listed is not about one man's personal gain. Nixon's wiretapping was.

Just because your mind can't conceive of a man so bent on changing the standing of the US in the world that this would be his 'gain'.

Besides, the power vs. security opposition you make is logically fallacious since a practice can be both.

It can be both, sure. It's not and for you to say it's both is very telling.

Just because your mind can't conceive of a man so bent on changing the standing of the US in the world that this would be his 'gain'.



It can be both, sure. It's not and for you to say it's both is very telling.

A) So in your own words, it is not PURELY personal gain. Thank you for making my point for me.

B) The second point was elementary logic, which you obviously don't get, just like you don't understand scientific method.

Your stupid sasquatch comments have no effect on me. I am neither a bigfoot hunter nor a bigfoot believer. I said as much here.

You continue to misconstrue my original comments, which were about scientific method. But since you have argued that science needs no evidence, no one here should be surprised that you continue to not know what science really is.

I apologize, I didn't realize it hurt your feelings so much.

http://static3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130701113427/theamazingworldofgumball/images/thumb/f/f9/Famous-characters-Troll-face-Troll-face-poker-45046.png/640px-Famous-characters-Troll-face-Troll-face-poker-45046.png

A) So in your own words, it is not PURELY personal gain. Thank you for making my point for me.

Nice edit, fraud. Oh, and you clearly haven't met POTUS's ego. If that's what drives him how would that NOT be personal gain?

B) The second point was elementary logic, which you obviously don't get, just like you don't understand scientific method.

It also follows that it CAN be either or it CAN be both.

I hope your students get the option of a refund, you're a complete fraud.

<point_laugh>

I hope your students get the option of a refund, you're a complete fraud.

<point_laugh>

Come on. That kind of attack really isn't needed. Stay classy.

Come on. That kind of attack really isn't needed. Stay classy.

You argue your way, I'll argue mine.

Dude is a pompous POS with the fragile sensibilities of a maiden aunt.

You argue your way, I'll argue mine.

Dude is a pompous POS with the fragile sensibilities of a maiden aunt.

That isn't arguing, that's just letting people know you lack the intelligence to actually put forth in a debate. Some of the best scientists/atheists in the world don't attack creationist when they debate them. They use logic and facts when debating them. When you resort to attacks, you simply lose all credibility and it devalues any good points you may have made.