NFL News Offseason Style

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37

Chico23231
06-12-2013, 04:19 PM
your trolling at this point. I don'y think anyone with an inkling of Skins past receivers would think Thrash is anything more than a special team guy. I certainly would want him as a back up slot guy and on teams, but your team is in trouble if he was one of your starting pair.

Sonny9TD
06-12-2013, 04:19 PM
I said he was solid. He was better on special teams than he was at receiver.

He was far from being pretty good. Sorry but I reserve that type of description for guys that avg a lot more than 24 catches a year and 2 TDs.

OK that is fine but you still haven't told me which receivers that were any better other than Santana Garcon and Cooley which I mentioned.

SmootSmack
06-12-2013, 04:19 PM
your trolling at this point. I don'y think anyone with an inkling of Skins past receivers would think Thrash is anything more than a special team guy. I certainly would want him as a back up slot guy and on teams, but your team is in trouble if he was one of your starting pair.

Definitely trolling.

Sonny9TD
06-12-2013, 04:21 PM
your trolling at this point. I don'y think anyone with an inkling of Skins past receivers would think Thrash is anything more than a special team guy. I certainly would want him as a back up slot guy and on teams, but your team is in trouble if he was one of your starting pair.

He dd as good as any as the Redskins have had. Made the QB look pretty good a few times as well. Trolling my azz.

NC_Skins
06-12-2013, 04:21 PM
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.mandatory.com/media/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-5.25.32-pm.png?9651


I guess we can add......"troll a football forum" ....to this list.

MTK
06-12-2013, 04:27 PM
OK that is fine but you still haven't told me which receivers that were any better other than Santana Garcon and Cooley which I mentioned.

I didn't realize you asked me to name anyone.

I could probably name a dozen Skins receivers over the years I'd take over Thrash, but this isn't even worth discussing.

Sonny9TD
06-12-2013, 04:27 PM
Definitely trolling.

You know better Smooty. Don't get so uptight just because Thrash caught 2 TDs in one game. Is that the best you got saying i'm trolling because I think Thrash was pretty good. Not surprising.

SmootSmack
06-12-2013, 04:32 PM
You know better Smooty. Don't get so uptight just because Thrash caught 2 TDs in one game. Is that the best you got saying i'm trolling because I think Thrash was pretty good. Not surprising.

Just stop. Thrash was a decent player and kudos to him for being in the league for 12 years. But you're trying to make him into something even he would admit he never was

Sonny9TD
06-12-2013, 04:32 PM
I didn't realize you asked me to name anyone.

I could probably name a dozen Skins receivers over the years I'd take over Thrash, but this isn't even worth discussing.

The point was Thrash was as good as we have had in a long time. But if you don't think he was better than average OK. I do. At least your responses state your opinion rather than just disagreeing to disagree. Although we disagree. Smoot and a few others can't do that.

Sonny9TD
06-12-2013, 04:34 PM
Just stop. Thrash was a decent player and kudos to him for being in the league for 12 years. But you're trying to make him into something even he would admit he never was

Stop what. That he was pretty good. Even you said he caught 2 TDs in one game. If you don't think he was fine but don't call me names because I think he was. You stop. All I said was that he was pretty good. I bet he would say he was pretty good. I'll call you on that.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum