NFL News Offseason Style

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

Chico23231
06-11-2013, 09:39 PM
The mothership loves that drama and polarizing figures. people have a strong opinion bout that. Sometime I think they too far trying to create negative image on atheletes so people will hatte.

Skinzman
06-11-2013, 09:40 PM
Difference is RG3 can play.

Irrelevant when it comes to media coverage. The entire love/hate dichotomy is already evident with RG3. Im not trumpeting Tebow as anything special. Just saying that non stop coverage of RG3 isnt always a good thing. Let the media clamour over Tebow for a while.

MTK
06-11-2013, 09:45 PM
Irrelevant when it comes to media coverage. The entire love/hate dichotomy is already evident with RG3. Im not trumpeting Tebow as anything special. Just saying that non stop coverage of RG3 isnt always a good thing. Let the media clamour over Tebow for a while.

Not sure about that.

A big part of the Tebow hate stems from all the coverage being dedicated to a crappy player.

Skinzman
06-11-2013, 09:52 PM
Not sure about that.

A big part of the Tebow hate stems from all the coverage being dedicated to a crappy player.

Read the comment section of articles about RG3. People are commenting from every corner of the globe it seems. And its clear that most either love him or hate him. With a lot of the comments hating on him saying they are sick of the coverage. Just look at the whole wedding gifts episode. There is absolutely no reason why that received the coverage that it did, and it was very polarizing.

Let the media have a new darling to run non stop coverage on. Im all for it.

MTK
06-11-2013, 10:08 PM
Read the comment section of articles about RG3. People are commenting from every corner of the globe it seems. And its clear that most either love him or hate him. With a lot of the comments hating on him saying they are sick of the coverage. Just look at the whole wedding gifts episode. There is absolutely no reason why that received the coverage that it did, and it was very polarizing.

Let the media have a new darling to run non stop coverage on. Im all for it.

Every player in the league has their fair share of haters if you read comment sections of articles. Best to just ignore that stuff.

EARTHQUAKE2689
06-11-2013, 10:13 PM
Not sure about that.

A big part of the Tebow hate stems from all the coverage being dedicated to a crappy player.

I would 100% agree with this, I have no problem with Tim Tebow. It is the fact that he sucks ass and is still brought up during the NBA Finals coverage. They didn't talk about Peyton this much when he was switching teams.

Chico23231
06-11-2013, 10:30 PM
Its like the Pats need another reason to hate them. If Tebow goes to Dallas next he's hit the trifecta on most hated teams in the league. F*ck the Pats, Meathead Gronk, Darth Douchy Cheat, Pretty Boy Cry Baby Brady, and now maybe the worst passer in the history of QB.

skinsfan69
06-12-2013, 12:40 AM
NFL Network is just as bad if not worse than ESPN. Half of Total Access is on Tebow. Pathetic.

Skinzman
06-12-2013, 06:56 AM
Goodell defends Redskins name in letter to Congress (http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/redskins/2013/06/11/washington-redskins-congress-roger-goodell/2412809/)

Good to hear.

MTK
06-12-2013, 09:55 AM
NFL Network is just as bad if not worse than ESPN. Half of Total Access is on Tebow. Pathetic.

All this Tebow talk has me longing for the days of Favre watch.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum