Five-year-old boy accidentally shoots, kills sister

Not much different than the shit you have been slinging.
....


.... a tremendous difference.

I'm confused. Did you not understand the article?




This isn't somebody's opinion.

That's pretty stupid. Its a country spread out with only 300,000 people. We know here the bigger the city the more crime. Go to fly over country and the crime rates drop like in Iceland. Also their conclusion is opinion.

.... a tremendous difference.

Do you need a box of tissues?


http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4111/5194789000_a80ae9e5e8_z.jpg

.... a tremendous difference.

The exchange rate is more than fair, you've used 'Right-wing gun nut' multiple times.

I doubt very much that any of the pro-gun rights people on this board are 'Right-wing gun nuts, but that wouldn't fit in with your bed-wetting hysterical viewpoint, would it?

I see you can make jokes as others lose their lives, interesting how you right wing gun nuts do that try and make things lite ,spin it to suit you.



Jeffrey Nugent says his brother Ted Nugent is wrong on background checks - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jeffrey-nugent-says-his-brother-ted-nugent-is-wrong-on-background-checks/2013/05/17/cdbfca92-bca6-11e2-89c9-3be8095fe767_story.html?hpid=z2)




LOL, gives one students opinion .
So, you call me a right wing gun nut (I promise I am neither), push an article that is one guys impassioned opinion, than bash another article as a student's opinion.

and you conveniently ignore any facts in any of the points presented against your position.

one of the worst thing about the state of our country's political discourse is that it is wrapped up in hyperbole, highly emotionalized, and mostly lacking in rational critical discussion.

if Sandy, and Moore, have shown us anything, life is given and taken in tragedy every day, I am done trying to explain why "just one life" is an emotionally cynical push to get a bad law passed that normally would not have a chance.

if Sandy, and Moore, have shown us anything, life is given and taken in tragedy every day, I am done trying to explain why "just one life" is an emotionally cynical push to get a bad law passed that normally would not have a chance.


1)Sandy and Moore are two completely different thing and Ray Charles could see that.
2) It's not that "you're done explaining" ,fact is you still haven't come up with any good reason yet why if a law that one side says won't work anyway, saves just one life ...is a bad law .

The exchange rate is more than fair, you've used 'Right-wing gun nut' multiple times.

I doubt very much that any of the pro-gun rights people on this board are 'Right-wing gun nuts, but that wouldn't fit in with your bed-wetting hysterical viewpoint, would it?



lol, I see I hit a nerve with the PEP Boys of the board.

lol, I see I hit a nerve with the PEP Boys of the board.

Spoken like a true troll.
Why are you on this board?
To act like an ass?

lol, I see I hit a nerve with the PEP Boys of the board.


I just explained the insult exchange rate, nothing more. You give yourself too much credit.

1)Sandy and Moore are two completely different thing and Ray Charles could see that.
2) It's not that "you're done explaining" ,fact is you still haven't come up with any good reason yet why if a law that one side says won't work anyway, saves just one life ...is a bad law .

Fact is you have not responded with one reason that says it is not a bad law, and I have listed several reasons why the justification of "saving just one life" is a bad method for writing new laws.