NFL Top 100 of 2013

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11

scowan
06-13-2013, 10:45 PM
So Andrew Luck is #23. Where will RGIII be? Top 20? or Top 10? They hinted at "a lot of QBs next week, so I have to think he is 15-20. I've seen top 5 listed as Rodgers, Peyton Manning, Brady, Megatron and Adrian Peterson, (not in that order)

Just nice to know that Robert will be Top 20.

skinsfaninok
06-13-2013, 10:58 PM
Honestly this list is a joke IMO. It's nice to see Griffin and luck up that high but in all seriousness, they ranked Cam Newton over Ben? And then not even voting Jimmy Graham on the list? Cmon

And as much grief I'll.get for saying this but Tony romo probably should have been in the 90s. If your going off stats he would be, for instance Trent Richardson was what? In the 60s? What did he even do last yr?

SFREDSKIN
06-13-2013, 11:37 PM
Honestly this list is a joke IMO. It's nice to see Griffin and luck up that high but in all seriousness, they ranked Cam Newton over Ben? And then not even voting Jimmy Graham on the list? Cmon

And as much grief I'll.get for saying this but Tony romo probably should have been in the 90s. If your going off stats he would be, for instance Trent Richardson was what? In the 60s? What did he even do last yr?

Example, Alfred Morris the 2nd leading rusher ranked #64. It's just like ESPN's best coaches. Bill Walsh better than George Halas and Paul Brown, what a joke.

CultBrennan59
06-14-2013, 12:15 AM
Yeah this list is a little questionable. Jimmy Graham isn't on the list supposedly. Gronk missed 5 games last year and had 4 surgeries and is still in the top 30 (where as Revis is the best CB in the NFL and has one surgery and drops almost 60 spots).

Then Andrew Luck, sure he is a high potential guy, but he wasn't a top 30 player last year, and the gap between him and Russell Wilson are a lot closer than they appear on this list at 50 and 23.

RG3 is where he deserves to be, a top 20 player (I'd personally put him in the top 10).

donofriose
06-14-2013, 12:45 AM
Jimmy graham should be on the list. Revis only played two games and gronk still scored 11 touchdowns, the rest of the surgeries happened after the season, so 2 games vs 11 touchdowns... Not that much of a debate.

As far as griffin being top 10... I'm not there yet. Too many good players in the league to give him the definite edge. Just based on last year I can't put griffin ahead of watt, Rodgers, manning, Brady, miller, Adrian Peterson, Calvin Johnson, Willis, Atkins, or Duane brown. I would even make the case sherman and ware are better but those two are debatable.But I do believe griffin will be a top 10 player next year. Should be top 20 this year though. List is kinda dumb anyway

CultBrennan59
06-14-2013, 09:59 AM
The point I was trying to make is that there's players who have had longer careers who are in the same class as gronk (like revis) who had an injury or players that played more and better last year than gronk (Hernandez, Atkins, roddy white, Julio, sherman, Welker to name a few) I would have put gronk in the 70s especially when there's questions now if he can stay healthy.

MTK
06-14-2013, 10:07 AM
Jimmy Graham being left off the list is just a joke.

I'm all for doing a list show like this, but they've got to get serious about how they put the list together. Poll more players and poll the media too. Come up with a rating system or something.

CultBrennan59
06-14-2013, 10:38 AM
Jimmy Graham being left off the list is just a joke.

I'm all for doing a list show like this, but they've got to get serious about how they put the list together. Poll more players and poll the media too. Come up with a rating system or something.

I agree, but I would still have it be just the players votes that count. I like the whole "players only voting for their peers " concept.

I would have the players vote for more than just 20 guys. I would have it be vote for your top 50 or 75 players. Maybe they can have rules like you can only vote for the other 31 teams, not your own team.

MTK
06-14-2013, 10:41 AM
I agree, but I would still have it be just the players votes that count. I like the whole "players only voting for their peers " concept.

I would have the players vote for more than just 20 guys. I would have it be vote for your top 50 or 75 players. Maybe they can have rules like you can only vote for the other 31 teams, not your own team.

Problem is a lot of the players just don't follow the entire league like fans or media do. Outside of the obvious superstars they're usually pretty clueless.

RGIII
06-14-2013, 11:04 AM
I imagine it's a ballot issue. Give the guys a insightful ballot to vote from.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum