Pro-gun article

BTW, you aren't going to keep claiming "nobody's trying to take your guns", are you?



Yes because they aren't .

What are you calling it? Permanent Safe Keeping?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Phila woman mistaken for groundhog is fatally shot by Stark farmer - News - The CantonRep - Canton, OH (http://www.cantonrep.com/article/20140506/NEWS/140509440)



A 79-year-old man said he thought he saw a groundhog when he shot a woman out in a field on his farm Monday afternoon.
The woman died Tuesday.
The Stark County Sheriff’s Office is still investigating the shooting, which appears to be accidental, and no charges have been filed, said Sheriff George T. Maier.
Natasha G. Stover, 22, of New Philadelphia, was an employee of the farm on Poorman Street SW. The man called 911 and the Brewster Fire Department responded and took the woman to Aultman Hospital. She suffered from a single gunshot wound to the head and died Tuesday in the hospital, the sheriff said.

Read more: Phila woman mistaken for groundhog is fatally shot by Stark farmer - News - The CantonRep - Canton, OH (http://www.cantonrep.com/article/20140506/News/140509440#ixzz31VSDBxhd)

And stop calling the cops if you are so anti-gun, they have guns too.

http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/10269577_644396035643314_4492898166159898068_n.jpg

Not trying to take your guns.... (http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/disarming-americas-heros-veterans-receiving-official-letters-prohibiting-them-from-purchasing-possessing-receiving-or-transporting-a-firearm-or-ammunition)

“A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”?

The letter provides no specifics on the reasons for the proposed finding of incompetency; just that is based on a determination by someone in the VA. In every state in the United States no one can be declared incompetent to administer their own affairs without due process of law and that usually requires a judicial hearing with evidence being offered to prove to a judge that the person is indeed incompetent. This is a requirement of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that states that no person shall “… be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law…”.

Obviously, the Department of Veterans Affairs can’t be bothered by such impediments as the Constitution, particularly since they are clearly pushing to fulfill one of Obama’s main goals, the disarming of the American people. Janet Napolitano has already warned law enforcement that some of the most dangerous among us are America’s heroes, our veterans, and now according to this letter from the VA they can be prohibited from buying or even possessing a firearm because of a physical or mental disability.

Think about it, the men and women who have laid their lives on the line to defend us and our Constitution are now having their own Constitutional rights denied. There are no clear criteria for the VA to declare a veteran incompetent. It can be the loss of a limb in combat, a head injury, a diagnosis of PTSD, or even a soldier just telling someone at the VA that he or she is depressed over the loss of a buddy in combat. In none of these situations has the person been found to be a danger to themselves or others. If that was the case than all of the Americans who have suffered from PTSD following the loss of a loved one or from being in a car accident would also have to be disqualified from owning firearms. It would also mean that everyone who has ever been depressed for any reason should be disarmed. In fact, many of the veterans being deprived of their rights have no idea why it is happening.

Sure.....

http://www.trbimg.com/img-51bfcab7/turbine/la-pn-obama-gun-control-20130617-001/600/600x399


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3485/3820769948_20b861c677.jpg

It amazes me that someone who posts this in the animal section:

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR6kgKOPaoGbyYCQzaL6rOXxbKBJyL0T Bfl35ZNwVxkPCVUfgW3nA

Doesn't understand the same principle when it comes to handguns.

It amazes me that someone who posts this in the animal section:

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR6kgKOPaoGbyYCQzaL6rOXxbKBJyL0T Bfl35ZNwVxkPCVUfgW3nA

Doesn't understand the same principle when it comes to handguns.


Well it amazes me you don't get it .The others are just to far gone to have any sense of reality .

Glade this guy second amendment rights were saved , he must be part of the militia .


http://6abc.com/archive/9533064/

NORTH COVENTRY TWP., Pa. - May 10, 2014 --
Authorites have announced an arrest in the shooting of an 8-year-old boy who was riding his bike in Chester County, and police say the suspect's interview on Action News helped them make that arrest.
The shooting happened around 5:00 p.m. Friday in the unit block of West Main Street.
Police say 55-year-old Wayne Snowden fired a random shot that struck 8-year-old A.J. Hagner.
"Drunk" and "erratic" is how North Coventry Township Police described Snowden, the man Action News interviewed a few hours after investigators say he fired the shot.
Chester County investigators say Snowden walked out onto his porch and randomly shot his gun toward West Main Street.
A.J., who was riding his bike with a friend, was hit in the thigh barely missing a major artery

I feel the same way about drunk drivers as I do about drunk people handling guns. Why do you insist on making it an issue it's clearly not?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk