Pro-gun article

Five people wounded in accidental shootings at THREE different gun and knife shows | Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265297/Five-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html)


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTMJD8t2b4D0D72-4CqCRA49JPNef8F4EtCK_3oI_ZNQ6RZFPpS (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=MC-g_RY6RDXD3M&tbnid=CL4ptwjNu5mTXM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farti cle-2265297%2FFive-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html&ei=K15QU8abJIGwyQGitYHoAQ&psig=AFQjCNESo7rIHb6RA5pKjvU4ksnea9bUCw&ust=1397862313779378)

Five people wounded in accidental shootings at THREE different gun and knife shows | Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265297/Five-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html)


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTMJD8t2b4D0D72-4CqCRA49JPNef8F4EtCK_3oI_ZNQ6RZFPpS (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=MC-g_RY6RDXD3M&tbnid=CL4ptwjNu5mTXM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farti cle-2265297%2FFive-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html&ei=K15QU8abJIGwyQGitYHoAQ&psig=AFQjCNESo7rIHb6RA5pKjvU4ksnea9bUCw&ust=1397862313779378)
Before reading the article, I am willing to bet that none of the people injured went stomping there feet to the government that there oughta be a law. Instead the people who were shot probably held the individuals who shot them responsible.

Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right

edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013.

G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent.

Before reading the article, I am willing to bet that none of the people injured went stomping there feet to the government that there oughta be a law. Instead the people who were shot probably held the individuals who shot them responsible.

Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right

edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013.

G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent.


Not a troll , the voice of reason to a small group of very unreasonable posters.
As I have said before I respect your opinion but I disagree .

Bloomberg wastes more more. Good.


Not a waste ,an investment .

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-MUuKSVGqupM/UNaW2RjO8mI/AAAAAAAAK8Y/KOYxLkancco/s1600/guns+don't+kill+people.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=XNcRJY0mQPOBJM&tbnid=gI_jC7gkEo_ILM:&ved=0CAgQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcognidissidence.blogspot.com%2F20 12%2F12%2Fguns-dont-kill-people-people-kill-people.html&ei=qlxQU-r-J8eiyASBg4KQBg&psig=AFQjCNGrCekqgTuEmh6zoPFWf7b52gW1bg&ust=1397861930707756)Glad there's signs that once in awhile you can think clearly. Though I think the poster maker didn't understand the subject matter any more than you do. This could be good. Broken clock, and all.

Re.the overall poster: So no blanket gun bans, gun restrictions, or gun taxes? Because you're not so stupid you're pissed at guns? Good.

Re.1: Mandatory safety programs? Particularly if the government pays for them, this is very good. From teaching kids NOT to play with guns, to youth and adult handling and shooting training, a one time course would be good. Maybe offer it in high school. The only tricky part is "mandatory". No permanent gun registration should be kept, just records that a person has taken the course, should be good for background checks. And the safety courses must not be restrictively priced high or scarce to find, like the shenanigans DC pulled here (http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/guns/2012/feb/8/miller-emily-got-her-gun/). Edit: You know what, still too vulnerable to government abuse, and tying classes to the right to bear arms is unconstitutional. Best thing to do would be to make it a one-time mandatory class in elementary school, and highschool, a requirement for graduation.

Re.2: Depends what you mean by "more thorough background checks". Enforcing existing laws better would be start.

Re.3: Depends of what the definitions of "negligence" laws, like simply having a gun that's not locked in a safe, are a no-go. Tougher penalties on brandishing, using guns like Joe Biden recommended, etc., criminal misuse of guns, would be good though.

So... glad to see some people coming around, I guess?

Not a waste ,an investment .

You should REALLY check what you're agreeing with before you blindly follow.

https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/10291815_725474554142000_5812638217245711089_n.jpg

This poster sums up how anti-gunners think. Anyone else amused by it?

You should REALLY check what you're agreeing with before you blindly follow.

This poster sums up how anti-gunners think. Anyone else amused by it?

Comprehension has never been your strong point ,Thank you for reminding us .

Why bother posting when you have nothing to say? You just confirm your idiocy.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

You should REALLY check what you're agreeing with before you blindly follow.

https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/10291815_725474554142000_5812638217245711089_n.jpg

This poster sums up how anti-gunners think. Anyone else amused by it?

More like it shows how much most of them know about guns showing a shell casing flying out of a barrel.

Exactly! If the fundamental understanding of firearms is so limited it's no surprise anti-gun people are terrified.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk