Pro-gun article


BigHairedAristocrat
04-18-2013, 09:29 AM
Cars are designed for transportation, look at how many people are killed by the misuse of them. Still readily available, still not banned. You miss the point. Handguns are specifically designed to cause injury/death to another human being. Cars are not.

You can also use a handgun as a deterrent, don't even need to fire a shot. Check under the desk of any 24 hour local market. They are a detrrent because they have the threat to kill someone. Youre proving my point. Guns are designed to injure/kill other human beings.

BigHairedAristocrat
04-18-2013, 09:32 AM
No I wouldnt be fine.
It wouldnt make a big enough bang to suit me.
It wouldnt give me a proper understanding of how it would work in a combat situation.
It wouldnt blow up milk jugs the way I like.
It wouldnt explode tannerite properly.
It wouldnt do a lot of things I like.

Thats like asking me if I wanted to stop doinking Kate Upton and do Ellen Degeneres instead.

Who cares about guns doing the things "you like?" Don't you think it would be worth sacrificing some of the things you liked, if only allowing rubber bullets would prevent even one child from dying of an accidental gunshot?

Alvin Walton
04-18-2013, 09:51 AM
Who cares about guns doing the things "you like?" Don't you think it would be worth sacrificing some of the things you liked, if only allowing rubber bullets would prevent even one child from dying of an accidental gunshot?

Obviously I do (and a few million other non bleeding hearts that would concur)....but if you dont want my/our vote to count then do something about it....comrade.

I'll buy rubber bullets when they outlaw automobiles and swimming pools.

Monkeydad
04-18-2013, 10:14 AM
Thankfully, the Senate rejected the knee-jerk gun bill.

RedskinRat
04-18-2013, 10:30 AM
You miss the point. Handguns are specifically designed to cause injury/death to another human being. Cars are not.

You say I miss the point yet clearly you're the one 'not getting it'. Look at the numbers for vehicular deaths and injuries. They are NOT designed to KILL. Think about that. NOT DESIGNED TO KILL. Now look at the numbers again.

That many deaths from something NOT DESIGNED OR INTENDED TO KILL.

Getting it yet?

They are a detrrent because they have the threat to kill someone. Youre proving my point. Guns are designed to injure/kill other human beings.

Yet they don't have to be used for the deterrent to work. Have you thought about your position on this at all? Serious question.

RedskinRat
04-18-2013, 10:36 AM
Who cares about guns doing the things "you like?" Don't you think it would be worth sacrificing some of the things you liked, if only allowing rubber bullets would prevent even one child from dying of an accidental gunshot?

Rubber bullets kill too.

RedskinRat
04-18-2013, 10:39 AM
Thankfully, the Senate rejected the knee-jerk gun bill.

But Petulant One will keep trying until the Liberal polls are validated.

Next up: Executive order.

Alvin Walton
04-18-2013, 10:49 AM
That executive order would create some serious civil unrest.
I hope the Hawaiian Kenyan is not that stupid.

RedskinRat
04-18-2013, 10:59 AM
I hope the Hawaiian Kenyan is not that stupid.

He's far from stupid, but he is colossally arrogant.

Monkeydad
04-18-2013, 01:13 PM
I just wish this President would get as angry when Americans are murdered in Benghazi and Boston as he does when his bills are defeated (by his own party). He blew a gasket yesterday in the Rose Garden.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum