Pro-gun article

LOL , lets see how long they go without" Federal Money".

Right, because that is how the Constitution and Bill of Rights viewed the balance between state and federal authority and responsibility(not to mention citizens rights)

So much for the will of the people.


Prove it ,let them vote on it.

Prove it ,let them vote on it.

So, are you saying a veto proof vote in the state legislature does not represent the will of that State's voting public?

the Missouri law is just for show. States cannot nullify or void federal laws. Either the federal law is determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and unenforceable or it is constitutional and binding on the States.

So, are you saying a veto proof vote in the state legislature does not represent the will of that State's voting public?



Actually Joe answered the question but I say let voters decide on the new laws ,not some paid off politician who is acting in the best interest of a corporation and not John Q. Public.

(CNN) (http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/14/justice/new-jersey-child-shooting-arrest/index.html) -- A New Jersey father of a 4-year-old boy who fatally shot a 6-year-old neighbor in the head was arrested Monday night for having unsecured weapons accessible to children, the Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office said.

Anthony Senatore, 33, was charged with six counts of endangering the welfare of children and a disorderly person's offense for enabling access by minors to a loaded firearm, Prosecutor Jim McClain said.

Good. I appreciate irresponsible gun owners being taken to task.

(CNN) (http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/14/justice/new-jersey-child-shooting-arrest/index.html) -- A New Jersey father of a 4-year-old boy who fatally shot a 6-year-old neighbor in the head was arrested Monday night for having unsecured weapons accessible to children, the Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office said.

Anthony Senatore, 33, was charged with six counts of endangering the welfare of children and a disorderly person's offense for enabling access by minors to a loaded firearm, Prosecutor Jim McClain said.

Good. I appreciate irresponsible gun owners being taken to task.

Wait, I am severely confused. How in the world could he be charged, since I thought there were no laws concerning responsible use of guns? [/sarcasm]

Meanwhile, in peaceful, gun-control England: (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-soldier-wearing-help-1904602)

A man - believed to be a soldier wearing a Help for Heroes t-shirt - was hacked to death in the street today.

Armed police called to the scene near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London, shot and injured two suspects.

Woolwich and Greenwich MP Nick Raynsford said both were in a serious condition in hospital.

One witness, identified as James, said he and his partner saw two black men attack the young man with kitchen knives like he was "a piece of meat".

"They were hacking at this poor guy, literally," he told LBC. "They were hacking at him, chopping him, cutting him.

Fighting back tears, he added: "These two guys were crazed. They were just animals.

"They dragged him from the pavement and dumped his body in the middle of the road and left his body there."

He said that after the "horrendous" attack, the two men, in their 20s, just stood around, waving knives and a gun, even asking people nearby to take pictures of them "as if they wanted to be on TV or something".

"They were oblivious to anything, they were more worried about having their photo taken, running up and down the road," he said.

http://i44.tinypic.com/351ybh5.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/351ybh5.jpg
:doh:...you realize this isn't a U.S. Base ,right.