Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013 Part II


RedskinRat
03-29-2013, 09:52 AM
And they say the Skins gave up too much?

The comparison revolts me <cough> but it's similar in magnitude <cough> as the deal <cough> that the Cowboys made for the Triplets. <Barf>

In my opinion it will be seen, in hindsight, the same way.

NYCskinfan82
03-29-2013, 10:00 AM
And they say the Skins gave up too much?

The even BIGGER story IMO is what will st. lou will do with those picks, they have to hit big.

12thMan
03-29-2013, 10:19 AM
Given the circumstances the Skins are rocking this offseason so far.

Also, Dallas and the Giants have lost some key faces. And Romo's future is still very much in the air.

NC_Skins
03-29-2013, 10:27 AM
Given the circumstances the Skins are rocking this offseason so far.

I concur with this. I'm satisfied with what they are doing. The one thing I'm skeptical about is having Fletcher around at his high cap number. I mean, if the Bears weren't willing to pay Urlacher 3 million, than why in the **** are we paying Fletch 5+ mil. Hell, I'd rather have Urlacher at a cheaper cost.

RedskinRat
03-29-2013, 10:37 AM
I concur with this. I'm satisfied with what they are doing. The one thing I'm skeptical about is having Fletcher around at his high cap number. I mean, if the Bears weren't willing to pay Urlacher 3 million, than why in the **** are we paying Fletch 5+ mil. Hell, I'd rather have Urlacher at a cheaper cost.

Because Fletcher is an integral part of our D and a better player.

NYCskinfan82
03-29-2013, 10:38 AM
Also, Dallas and the Giants have lost some key faces. And Romo's future is still very much in the air.

Report: Romo can’t be tagged in 2014 | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/29/report-romo-cant-be-tagged-in-2014/)

You might want to read this.

NYCskinfan82
03-29-2013, 10:38 AM
Because Fletcher is an integral part of our D and a better player.

Took the words out of my mouth.

MTK
03-29-2013, 10:41 AM
I concur with this. I'm satisfied with what they are doing. The one thing I'm skeptical about is having Fletcher around at his high cap number. I mean, if the Bears weren't willing to pay Urlacher 3 million, than why in the **** are we paying Fletch 5+ mil. Hell, I'd rather have Urlacher at a cheaper cost.

Fletcher has a bit more left in the thank that Urlacher at this point. His left knee is shot. The Bears were probably glad he didn't take their offer.

donofriose
03-29-2013, 10:43 AM
Urlacher is really not good at all anymore. But London will need to be replaced, his play has obviously declined. There are some potential upgrades in the draft. We will see.

CultBrennan59
03-29-2013, 10:47 AM
As far as Urlacher and Fletcher talk. Let me make this as simple as possible for you. Fletcher has yet to miss a game. Urlacher misses many games every year now.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum