artmonkforhallofamein07
03-18-2013, 03:13 PM
Exactly Skinzman.
These RTs all got little to no gaurenteed money (TP and JT for sure) and most likely signed vet min deals. They will probably be under the rule of 51 once the roster fills out.
SkinzWin
03-18-2013, 03:19 PM
If we bring back Hall we are not improving as a secondary. In fact its more likely we are taking a step back at the CB position.
I fail to understand how resigning a player you had on your roster for the last couple of years is taking a step back. Obviously we do not have the cap room to pursue a viable top tier FA at the CB position. If we did, I'm sure we would have done it.
Chico23231
03-18-2013, 03:22 PM
There were two weak parts to the team last year, Secondary and RT. Bad secondary gives up TD's. Bad RT gives up injuries to RG3. A bad secondary can be fixed with cap space back next year. RG3 can only be fixed so many times by Dr Andrews.
Im all for going after RT.
Btw, what veteran CB was signing for what we got the three tackles at? Its not like we have 30 mil wrapped in cap space this year for the RT's.
The sameone we could bring back D Hall for.
Skinzman
03-18-2013, 03:26 PM
The sameone we could bring back D Hall for.
We can easily clear enough cap space to sign anyone at what we paid for those tackles. So if Hall is willing to take that little, he will be a Redskin next year. Contrary to popular belief, signing Pashos or Youngblood was not the reason Hall was cut.
Fine with T.P. coming back to stride to improve, looking more and more like we need to bring Hall back.. and i'd be fine with that as well...
Chico23231
03-18-2013, 03:35 PM
Fine with T.P. coming back to stride to improve, looking more and more like we need to bring Hall back.. and i'd be fine with that as well...
appropriate initials
Still hoping Compton can beat out TP, we need to improve at Right Tackle.
Gtothearry
03-18-2013, 03:35 PM
If we bring back Hall we are not improving as a secondary. In fact its more likely we are taking a step back at the CB position.
We need help at safety. Madieu was awful last year. I can't imagine what it was like for our DB's to put any trust in him. I think if Safety is solidified our DB play will increase tremendously.
DynamiteRave
03-18-2013, 03:54 PM
appropriate initials
Still hoping Compton can beat out TP, we need to improve at Right Tackle.
If Compton can't beat out the human turnstile, then we might have a lil bit of an issue.
Chico23231
03-18-2013, 03:56 PM
I fail to understand how resigning a player you had on your roster for the last couple of years is taking a step back. Obviously we do not have the cap room to pursue a viable top tier FA at the CB position. If we did, I'm sure we would have done it.
If I had a to bracket out the availbable CB...Revis would be seeded #1 and D Hall would be a 16# seed and actually in the playin game. His game is weak son
Lotus
03-18-2013, 04:08 PM
of course not, he's borderline horrible. guy can run block ok. thats it.
So lets gets this straight....We've signed 3 vetern Tackles, bringing back Hurt and a rookie who Shanny wanted in Compton last year for competition at the Tackle spot....meanwhile no signings of vetern secondary players. So that means we are happy with the weakest part of the team last year...?
IMO we know who we want in the defensive backfield. We're just waiting for the market to settle. With each passing day, the Winfields, Halls, etc., of the world get cheaper to sign.