Societal Decay - Henson Ong

your post about kevlar suit (most people would assume bullet proof vest) was post #72 my post about not using an ar was #76.



#81

Here we go....

Senate Bill 5737, states in part that:

In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.

Chip, chip, chip......

Sheriffs in your bedroom.....wonderful.....
Great example of Big Brother.
I really hate timid people and all the new dumb ass laws they think up.

Here we go....

Senate Bill 5737, states in part that:

In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.

Chip, chip, chip......

that's insane. conduct an inspection?

#81

You lost me. He didn't have one on.

Here's how I imagine this 'gun control' playing out:

1) Increase the tax of ammunition to the point where it's too expensive for average people to buy.

2) Introduce increasingly invasive 'checks' on gun owners that make it a complete pain in the arse to own a firearm.

3) Permit owners to store guns at a licensed facility (like a gun range) so as to avoid invasive checks.

4) Facilities are closed down and/or all firearms confiscated.

Here's how I imagine this 'gun control' playing out:

1) Increase the tax of ammunition to the point where it's too expensive for average people to buy.

2) Introduce increasingly invasive 'checks' on gun owners that make it a complete pain in the arse to own a firearm.

3) Permit owners to store guns at a licensed facility (like a gun range) so as to avoid invasive checks.

4) Facilities are closed down and/or all firearms confiscated.

Yea right. You forgot that they would have to go door to door to collect these guns. Also if you tax amunition too much it will just go under ground.

Yea right. You forgot that they would have to go door to door to collect these guns.

Already covered.

3) Permit owners to store guns at a licensed facility (like a gun range) so as to avoid invasive checks.

When I say 'permit' I actually mean coerce or subtly force.

Here's how I imagine this 'gun control' playing out:

1) Increase the tax of ammunition to the point where it's too expensive for average people to buy.

2) Introduce increasingly invasive 'checks' on gun owners that make it a complete pain in the arse to own a firearm.

3) Permit owners to store guns at a licensed facility (like a gun range) so as to avoid invasive checks.

4) Facilities are closed down and/or all firearms confiscated.

None of those will ever happen.
#2 and #4 are fairly ridiculous.

Already covered.

3) Permit owners to store guns at a licensed facility (like a gun range) so as to avoid invasive checks.

When I say 'permit' I actually mean coerce or subtly force.

Still would not happen. To many people feel its their right to own a gun and would be to periniod (sp) to turn them in or check them in for any reason. One of the main reason people do not want background checks is it lets the gov. know your purchasing a gun that they could trace.

Still would not happen. To many people feel its their right to own a gun and would be to periniod (sp) to turn them in or check them in for any reason. One of the main reason people do not want background checks is it lets the gov. know your purchasing a gun that they could trace.

Those are the exact people I don't want to have guns. Gun ownership is not a right, a right is something that cannot be taken away -- guns are a privilege. Otherwise everyone regardless of felon status or mental health status would have the right to own one. If you're not willing to submit to a background check, the punishment should be steep.