Gardner to Vikes?

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

BrudLee
03-06-2005, 07:40 PM
Why not Gardner and the 9th pick for the 7th? If he's worth no more than a third round pick, that's a steal for us.

Daseal
03-06-2005, 07:41 PM
Because we'd have to pay more to most likely the same player?

BrudLee
03-06-2005, 07:45 PM
Because we'd have to pay more to most likely the same player?
We'd pay more, but have Gardner's salary off the cap. We'd also have a better chance at the player we want, rather than the "best available" at a position.

TheMalcolmConnection
03-06-2005, 08:29 PM
So the Vikes might think that Gardner is their WR of the future? Tee hee. Hell, that's fine with me. You pick him and we'll take Williams.

e16bball
03-06-2005, 09:19 PM
If we are trading Gardner to the Vikes, I don't see any reason to make it the 9th and Gardner for the 7th, and this is why: If we trade them Gardner, they won't take a WR anyway. Thus, we gain nothing from moving up to 7, since the Cardinals assuredly won't take a WR. At 7, we would still be behind the Bears, Bucs, and Titans, all of whom may be threats to take a WR. We would be much better off taking a 3rd rounder from them for Gardner than moving up to number 7, if we did that trade.

I would still prefer a trade involving Gardner and the 9th going to Tampa Bay for the 5th. Even if we have to throw in another pick, it guarantees our guy.

TheMalcolmConnection
03-06-2005, 10:50 PM
Exactly. So I'm guessing everyone is sold on Williams as our man? I'm liking Williamson as well and I think if we had to take him as a "last resort," I would be extremely satisfied with that kind of last resort.

e16bball
03-06-2005, 11:05 PM
Right, Williamson isn't a bad fallback guy, but Williams is such a stellar fit. I am 100% sold on him.

mooby
03-06-2005, 11:20 PM
yeah so am i. williams is tall, he's an art monk kinda guy. there are just a lot of teams before us interested in wideouts.

ST21
03-07-2005, 03:42 AM
Williams....He Gone

Redskins8588
03-07-2005, 04:45 AM
Exactly. So I'm guessing everyone is sold on Williams as our man? I'm liking Williamson as well and I think if we had to take him as a "last resort," I would be extremely satisfied with that kind of last resort.
Not everyone, I mean Williams would be a good fit for us but I still would like to trade down for more picks and pick up Clayton. I think that he would work for us, and give us oppertunities to fill other needs. But I am not going to pout and rais a fuss if we do get to draft Williams, like I said he would still be a good fit I am just thinking of how we can take care of other positions and still get a playmaker at the WR position.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum