ashvirtually
01-06-2013, 10:53 PM
Na, some things are obvious,...Sure, if you are seeing what you want to see and creating scenarios to fit what you want to see out of whole cloth...
RG3 cleared to play (update)ashvirtually 01-06-2013, 10:53 PM Na, some things are obvious,...Sure, if you are seeing what you want to see and creating scenarios to fit what you want to see out of whole cloth... MTK 01-06-2013, 10:55 PM Na, some things are obvious, unless his legs made of rubber... But Matty is right, lets wait and see... What's obvious to me is he re-aggravated his knee on that rollout near the goal line. Before that he seemed to be moving about the same as he was doing against Dallas. NC_Skins 01-06-2013, 11:05 PM What's obvious to me is he re-aggravated his knee on that rollout near the goal line. Before that he seemed to be moving about the same as he was doing against Dallas. Correct. I think the brace and knee may have still been hindering him some, but it was evident after that rollout that he reinjured something. Also, this notion that RGIII's LCL was torn in the Baltimore game is ludicrous. While I think Shanahan handled tonight's reinjury horribly, I don't think he trotted out his star QB with a tore LCL. skinsfaninok 01-06-2013, 11:08 PM Mark Schlereth "no problem with the redskins playing RGIII all game, he's the franchise qb let him play " HailGreen28 01-06-2013, 11:11 PM What's obvious to me is he re-aggravated his knee on that rollout near the goal line. Before that he seemed to be moving about the same as he was doing against Dallas.Talking about when he was untouched after falling down near the sideline and came up visibly limping? In hindsight, should RG3 have been pulled after that series? MTK 01-06-2013, 11:14 PM Talking about when he was untouched after falling down near the sideline and came up visibly limping? In hindsight, should RG3 have been pulled after that series? Yeah that play when he tried to hit Garcon. On his INT I made up my mind then he should have come out. It was pretty obvious he couldn't drive off his back foot. HailGreen28 01-06-2013, 11:21 PM Yeah that play when he tried to hit Garcon. On his INT I made up my mind then he should have come out. It was pretty obvious he couldn't drive off his back foot.Yeah, the INT was uncharacteristic, seems like he usually overthrows those deep passes. 'Course I was an idiot cheering for him to stay in until his knee collapsed. skinsfaninok 01-06-2013, 11:33 PM Also on that INT garcon was clearly grabbed but it was also a great play by a pro bowler in Thomas. O well it's something to learn from for griff. Overall he still played decent. Ruhskins 01-06-2013, 11:56 PM Also on that INT garcon was clearly grabbed but it was also a great play by a pro bowler in Thomas. O well it's something to learn from for griff. Overall he still played decent. I think people, even Buck/Aikman, did not give Earl Thomas enough credit for that pick. There is a reason he is a Pro Bowler, that was a great play. BTW, is it just me or did the Adderal Twins did not much of an effect? Then again we didn't pass that much. Sent from my GT-P5113 using Tapatalk 2 MTK 01-06-2013, 11:57 PM I think people, even Buck/Aikman, did not give Earl Thomas enough credit for that pick. There is a reason he is a Pro Bowler, that was a great play. BTW, is it just me or did the Adderal Twins did not much of an effect? Then again we didn't pass that much. Sent from my GT-P5113 using Tapatalk 2 Well, other than getting into constant shoving matches with our WRs. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum