CRedskinsRule
12-17-2012, 12:20 PM
I understand the question, the comparative cost in hindsight is significant. HOWEVER, at the point of the draft, you would have been gambling this franchise's future for a 5'10 running qb. Shanahan may have been run out of town before the season started, and Wilson never would have gotten the chance to start. Add in the fact that he mainly won in a domed stadium with maybe the best homefield advantage in sports, and lost on the road, we would right now be in the midst of a coaching hunt. And that's before ST/Defense comes in as a factor. Finally, Griffin has held up and flourished under the media scrutiny that this town brings, I don't know how Wilson has done in Seattle, or how he would have done here, but again, I don't think it's a guarantee he succeeds at it like Griffin has.
(to Redskins4Ever: Bob will never be worn out. I dream of the Superbowl trophy being raised, and Danny saying "This one's for Bob", only he doesn't have to wait as long as John did ;) )
That's true but he's already been hurt twice now running out of the pocket. We were very fortunate that he didn't have a devestating knee injury last week. With his style of play we're going to need a quality back up.
Check.
See yesterday.
CRedskinsRule
12-17-2012, 12:29 PM
Really because RGII seems to be pretty well played...When I say RG3 I expect to see R2D2's cousin.
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSy7fKM4YXeIm3vBAN1RW-Po8ouX08BN6T-Je3y8NApDMwcFMvomBvxaoko
there is a poster on cowboyszone.com that refers to Griffin as R2D2. I don't get the reference.
The Goat
12-17-2012, 02:02 PM
It's a pretty interesting question. I think if you limit the decision factors to draft picks (traded) and stats it's not crazy to wonder if Wilson would have been the better "deal." When you consider the intangibles it could be a totally different story though. I don't know much about Wilson, but I do know any QB in DC is under intense pressure/limelight and RG has shown extraordinary maturity and character. Wilson may be a real solid dude, but how do you know whether he could handle DC? DC after being sent out to catch a pass against Ryan Clark? DC with a 3-6 record and concern mounting about regime etc?
Wilson, by comparison, has had it pretty easy. Better defense. Better coaching IMO (yeah, I realize everyone disagrees and feel free to post a million face palms, I don't care). Just no telling how he would have held up here. RG's intangibles are as impressive as his stats, and I think Mike and the braintrust recognized that early on.
los panda
12-17-2012, 02:11 PM
griff = 1st in the division
wilson = ?
the only player clearly on his last leg is fletcher, everyone else can make it past the cap penalties and the lack of 1st round picks.
soon enough, people will stop questioning the griff trade
CrustyRedskin
12-17-2012, 02:13 PM
That's true but he's already been hurt twice now running out of the pocket. We were very fortunate that he didn't have a devestating knee injury last week. With his style of play we're going to need a quality back up.
That pretty much logically sums it up. Nice. :food-smil
30gut
12-17-2012, 03:08 PM
In hindsight what would have been the better pick for the Skins? Remember Russell allows us to keep all our draft picks. We ahve 3 more first round picks assuming we drafted Wilson in the later rounds.
Just something to chew on.
I think I still take RGIII.
Russell or Robert? I'll take Robert.
Russell plus the 3 1st round picks or Robert? I'll take Russell and the picks.
SmootSmack
12-17-2012, 03:10 PM
I kind of expected the question after yesterday to have been Roberto or keep the picks plus Cousins
I kind of expected the question after yesterday to have been Roberto or keep the picks plus Cousins
That's the more logical question.