|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
[ 11]
12
13
14
15
16
17
Again, you've answered your own question.
A more important question is why did he even get those four opportunities, given the preceding games? All season it's been missed blocks (some of which put RG on the ground), dropped passes, stutter steps after the one or two catches.
I mean the real question is why Paul is on the field at all, let alone (still) getting passes thrown his way, right?
So what's your reason? Enlighten us.
FRPLG 12-11-2012, 07:53 PM Actually, I gotta say there's been little substance thrown my way here, you included. I posted Cooley's stats and referenced them. The counter has been nonsense, and some stupidity about a conspiracy that you or someone else brought up.
What stats? Where?
Ruhskins 12-11-2012, 07:53 PM Again, you've answered your own question.
A more important question is why did he even get those four opportunities, given the preceding games? All season it's been missed blocks (some of which put RG on the ground), dropped passes, stutter steps after the one or two catches.
I mean the real question is why Paul is on the field at all, let alone (still) getting passes thrown his way, right?
Your argument makes no sense given that:
A. Paul is not much involved in the offense
B. RG3 targets his WRs WAY more than his TEs
I'm sorry, but your argument that Paul is taking from Cooley makes no sense whatsoever. Even if you were unbiased about Shanny, I'd be making the same counter argument.
If you want to say that Paul shouldn't be on the field, that's one thing. But you're argument is that Paul is taking away from Cooley's time. That's just not the case and both player are irrelevant to the passing game given their target #'s.
JoeRedskin 12-11-2012, 07:54 PM Paul has only been targeted four times in the past 5 games, how is that taking passes away from anyone? Please explained in a coherent way with facts. Thanks.
(Keep in mind that I don't like Paul)
By putting Paul in the game as a viable scripted receiving option, Kyle is removing Cooley's ability to be a final slower checkdown for RGIII which is occuring because b/c Griffin doesn't have time to go through all his progressions which, in turn, is occurring b/c Mike Shanahan signed Garcon rather than Winston & Gaffney which would have allowed RGIII time to go through all his progressions and hit the checkdown man who normally would have been Gaffney except, since Gaffney is slow as molasses, he would have been covered forcing RGIII to throw the ball to the unscripted wide-open TE Cooley on every other play.
It's a mofo'ing plot ... Mike AND Kyle are holding Cooley back.
Defensewins 12-11-2012, 07:57 PM Actually, I gotta say there's been little substance thrown my way here, you included. I posted Cooley's stats and referenced them. The counter has been nonsense, and some stupidity about a conspiracy that you or someone else brought up.
Inset laugh. If it were only 2010!
http://bestuff.com/images/images_of_stuff/210x600/mutley-27112.jpg?1173284720
FRPLG 12-11-2012, 07:58 PM The part I don't get is this...maybe Paul is "taking" away from CC but it seems the argument being proposed is that CC is capable of being "better" in some way. I'll grant that he could "possibly" do better but based on the latest information I have seen he doesnt have a lot to offer in the passing game. I have no reason to actually think he could do anymore in the passing game than my grandad. And since we're talking about such a small aspect of the offense I am pretty fine with letting a younger more dynamic player develop.
Ruhskins 12-11-2012, 08:00 PM By putting Paul in the game as a viable scripted receiving option, Kyle is removing Cooley's ability to be a final slower checkdown for RGIII which is occuring because b/c Griffin doesn't have time to go through all his progressions which, in turn, is occurring b/c Mike Shanahan signed Garcon rather than Winston & Gaffney which would have allowed RGIII time to go through all his progressions and hit the checkdown man who normally would have been Gaffney except, since Gaffney is slow as molasses, he would have been covered forcing RGIII to throw the ball to the unscripted wide-open TE Cooley on every other play.
It's a mofo'ing plot ... Mike AND Kyle are holding Cooley back.
:rofl:
FRPLG 12-11-2012, 08:01 PM By putting Paul in the game as a viable scripted receiving option, Kyle is removing Cooley's ability to be a final slower checkdown for RGIII which is occuring because b/c Griffin doesn't have time to go through all his progressions which, in turn, is occurring b/c Mike Shanahan signed Garcon rather than Winston & Gaffney which would have allowed RGIII time to go through all his progressions and hit the checkdown man who normally would have been Gaffney except, since Gaffney is slow as molasses, he would have been covered forcing RGIII to throw the ball to the unscripted wide-open TE Cooley on every other play.
It's a mofo'ing plot ... Mike AND Kyle are holding Cooley back.
Duh on me...I'm disappointed in myself for not realizing this earlier. Man what a rube I am.
SkinsGuru 12-11-2012, 08:02 PM Citation?
??? Citation ??? i work for Citation Technologies (Citation Technologies Inc. | Regulatory Compliance Software (http://www.citation.com)) if that is what you are asking??
FRPLG 12-11-2012, 08:03 PM ??? Citation ??? i work for Citation Technologies (Citation Technologies Inc. | Regulatory Compliance Software (http://www.citation.com)) if that is what you are asking??
Are YOU holding CC back too?
|