SmootSmack
12-07-2012, 05:28 AM
I don't think Goodell is seriously considering this. I think this is one of those cases where he threw an Idea out there to gauge the public reaction
Replacing the KOSmootSmack 12-07-2012, 05:28 AM I don't think Goodell is seriously considering this. I think this is one of those cases where he threw an Idea out there to gauge the public reaction Coff 12-07-2012, 09:23 AM I don't think Goodell is seriously considering this. I think this is one of those cases where he threw an Idea out there to gauge the public reaction If so, the reaction has been clear: it isn't popular. As I stated above, I actually like the idea, not so much because it gets rid of kick-offs, but because it gets rid of onside kicks. Onside kicks are ridiculous. They remind me of penalty kicks in soccer: something that is a very small part of the game becomes a major determining factor in the outcome of the game. The NFL should replace onside kicks with the 4th and 15 scenario for no other reason than onside kicks are dumb, fluky plays while the 4th and 15 scenario taps into the fundamental spirit of the game. donofriose 12-07-2012, 10:08 AM Having no Kickoffs would be better than watching a commercial, then a kickoff go to the back of the endzone which takes 5 seconds and then an other commercial. skinsguy 12-07-2012, 11:12 AM I understand Goodell may have thrown that out there just to gauge public reaction, but he doesn't throw that out there without some tendency of wanting to seriously move in that direction. Otherwise, he would never have mentioned it. If you want to make the game of football safer, put your investments toward the technology that's going to make the safety equipment protect the players better. Football is a dangerous, vicious, contact sport. That's just the way it is. Don't like it? Don't play it. Don't watch it. skinsguy 12-07-2012, 11:13 AM Having no Kickoffs would be better than watching a commercial, then a kickoff go to the back of the endzone which takes 5 seconds and then an other commercial. Trust me, advertisers will get their commercials in someway, you'd still have commercial breaks - they would just work them in at some other annoying point during the ball game. donofriose 12-07-2012, 11:17 AM Trust me, advertisers will get their commercials in someway, you'd still have commercial breaks - they would just work them in at some other annoying point during the ball game. What I think would happen is there would be longer commercial breaks after at a team scores. Which I am ok with. It is like Hulu where you can sometimes get the option to watch all the commercials at first then watch the entire show commercial free. I like the second option. RedskinRat 12-07-2012, 11:17 AM I understand Goodell may have thrown that out there just to gauge public reaction <snip>. Goodell doesn't give a fark about public opinion. skinsguy 12-07-2012, 11:23 AM Goodell doesn't give a fark about public opinion. LOL, true! But then again, I could see him asking for public opinion just so he could smugly do the exact opposite just because he's the commish. Sonny9TD 12-07-2012, 11:24 AM interesting out of the box thinking. I still want some help for our defense on 3rd down conversion ratio. 53Fan 12-07-2012, 11:34 AM I understand Goodell may have thrown that out there just to gauge public reaction, but he doesn't throw that out there without some tendency of wanting to seriously move in that direction. Otherwise, he would never have mentioned it. If you want to make the game of football safer, put your investments toward the technology that's going to make the safety equipment protect the players better. Football is a dangerous, vicious, contact sport. That's just the way it is. Don't like it? Don't play it. Don't watch it. Exactly. Improve the equipment...don't change the game. Right now the NFL has the most popular sport in America. Why change the game? Did Goodell work for Coca Cola long time ago? |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum