FARAPS
02-28-2005, 10:03 PM
i would really love to grab mike williams, his size would allow him to dominate in the redzone...i heard from somewhere that he is expected to go anywhere from 11 to 20. do you really think he will go that low because i would love it if he would drop to us!
e16bball
02-28-2005, 10:25 PM
It's really uncertain at this point. He could go as high as about number 5, but he could also slip as low as 12 in my opinion. I just can't imagine a circumstance in which he gets past the Bears, Bucs, Titans, Vikes, us, Cowboys, AND Chargers.
FARAPS
02-28-2005, 10:30 PM
oh i know he wont get past us if he falls there, but its still unlikely he gets past the bears and the vikings, not counting anyone who trades up. i read somewhere that williamson could take the place of the number 2 wide receiver over braylon, but i doubt that will happen. but at least that shows that williamson would still be a good choice for us.
Redskins8588
02-28-2005, 11:04 PM
We should look at tradeing down our pick and picking up more picks and Mark Clayton. That way we would be able to use the other picks to address our other needs.
FARAPS
02-28-2005, 11:24 PM
i dont want mark clayton, hes older than most of the other receivers and not just that i dont think hes as talented, wide receiver is a huge need for us and i think we should get the best one possible and if williamson is available above clayton i think we should definetly take him.
That Guy
03-01-2005, 12:10 AM
we're stilla bit clogged on average WRs... our problem is we don't have a TO/Moss/CJ type guy since LC got hurt, so i think he'd be a bit more than useless to us right now.
Redskins8588
03-01-2005, 12:49 AM
i dont want mark clayton, hes older than most of the other receivers and not just that i dont think hes as talented, wide receiver is a huge need for us and i think we should get the best one possible and if williamson is available above clayton i think we should definetly take him.
I will be the first one to admit that I dont watch college football so I never saw Williamson, Clayton, Williams, or Edwards actually play a down of football. With that being said, I did watch the combine, now I know that you cant really base alot off of the combine, but that is all that I got to see of these players. Givin Edwards and Williams didnt do the drills the jury is out on them. But Clayton and Williamson did do the drills, and from what I saw I liked Clayton. He is good and by drafting him we could trade down pick up more picks and take care of other needs and still come out of the draft with a playmaking WR.
Another WR I would like to see us get is Vincent Jackson out of Northern Colorado.
BossHog
03-01-2005, 11:51 AM
Well if McCants is forever in the Gibbs' doghouse, why not bring a guy like Terrell in to compete? Thrash isn't isn't getting any younger, or faster.
TheMalcolmConnection
03-01-2005, 11:53 AM
I will say that I've liked Thrash's moves as a return man and later in the year he did pretty well with the clutch catches. I can see him as the #2/#3.
BossHog
03-01-2005, 11:54 AM
we're stilla bit clogged on average WRs... our problem is we don't have a TO/Moss/CJ type guy since LC got hurt, so i think he'd be a bit more than useless to us right now.
I'm with THAT GUY. But that's the question. Who is the next TO/Moss/Pepto? :oink: