BleedBurgundy
02-26-2005, 12:00 PM
I'd heard he signed, but I didn't know where... I figured with Moss as our new #1(Maybe?) we'd need a physical guy unless we were comfortable with McCants.... Anyone else know anything, I can't find it on the net...
SmootSmack
02-26-2005, 12:02 PM
He's supposedly going to Chicago
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3422946
BleedBurgundy
02-26-2005, 12:19 PM
Thanks! You just helped me ruin a Ravens fan's day!
skins009
02-26-2005, 12:58 PM
This a real good news for the skins. Now the bears might now use their first round pick on a reciever. This could possibly mean that Edwards or Williams will be on the board when we pick.
SmootSmack
02-26-2005, 01:06 PM
This a real good news for the skins. Now the bears might now use their first round pick on a reciever. This could possibly mean that Edwards or Williams will be on the board when we pick.
I'm guessing you mean might not use their first round pick on a receiver, right?
BIGREDSKINFAN63
02-26-2005, 01:35 PM
according to espn& the nfl network,it's a done deal,muhammad is now a chicago bear.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2000387
BossHog
02-26-2005, 02:06 PM
I'm more concerned about our trade for Santana Moss. With his current contract expiring after the 2005 season, what type of money will we have to shell out to keep him? He will be a unrestricted free agent. And we'll be back at square one. That's why it's so important to build through the draft and develop those players. Imagine the leverage we would have if Pierce had started a season earlier under Greg Williams. He would've been a highly sought restricted free agent as supposed to being unrestricted. Jacobs is approaching the same situation. If we keep sitting him until the end of his contract, no team is going to value him as a restricted free agent. And we'll have to settle for offering him a one-year tender followed by unrestricted free agency. With no leverage. :oink:
celts32
02-26-2005, 03:21 PM
This a real good news for the skins. Now the bears might now use their first round pick on a reciever. This could possibly mean that Edwards or Williams will be on the board when we pick.
Good point.
I am also glad that Muhamed is gone before the Redskins decided to sniff in his direction. The last thing the skins need is an aging WR looking for his last big payday.
DCopper04
02-26-2005, 04:09 PM
I'm more concerned about our trade for Santana Moss. With his current contract expiring after the 2005 season, what type of money will we have to shell out to keep him? He will be a unrestricted free agent. And we'll be back at square one. That's why it's so important to build through the draft and develop those players. Imagine the leverage we would have if Pierce had started a season earlier under Greg Williams. He would've been a highly sought restricted free agent as supposed to being unrestricted. Jacobs is approaching the same situation. If we keep sitting him until the end of his contract, no team is going to value him as a restricted free agent. And we'll have to settle for offering him a one-year tender followed by unrestricted free agency. With no leverage. :oink:
The Skins will not trade for Moss unless the two sides agree to an extension beforehand. Good thbought BossHog, but Allah (aka Gibbs) is one step ahead of you.