NC_Skins
06-18-2012, 11:42 AM
You left out what he was really saying about those computers.
It was a technology, he said, that had been fostered by competition—competition he said the federal government lacks in delivering its services to Americans. He said the government's lack of competition and bureaucracy was hurting the United States in keeping jobs that are moving to other countries.
Guess what? It's because of guys like HIM that jobs are shipped overseas. DUHHHHH!!
I didnt' miss anything. I was to note how out of touch with reality and common people he is. He's that excited to see this technology that's been out for god knows how long? Shows you he doesn't mingle or have a clue about common people. His personal chef cooks for him, elevators for his cars, etc.....
Not remotely in touch with middle class America.
CRedskinsRule
06-18-2012, 11:54 AM
Guess what? It's because of guys like HIM that jobs are shipped overseas. DUHHHHH!!
I didnt' miss anything. I was to note how out of touch with reality and common people he is. He's that excited to see this technology that's been out for god knows how long? Shows you he doesn't mingle or have a clue about common people. His personal chef cooks for him, elevators for his cars, etc.....
Not remotely in touch with middle class America.
no long term politician is. Seriously, lets put their pay back to 50-75K a year, and then see how many stay in office.
firstdown
06-18-2012, 12:56 PM
Guess what? It's because of guys like HIM that jobs are shipped overseas. DUHHHHH!!
I didnt' miss anything. I was to note how out of touch with reality and common people he is. He's that excited to see this technology that's been out for god knows how long? Shows you he doesn't mingle or have a clue about common people. His personal chef cooks for him, elevators for his cars, etc.....
Not remotely in touch with middle class America.
The author said he was excited over the computer not him. What was he suppose to say when they showed him how it worked? I guess he could have yawned and said that's old school. All politicains are out of touch with the American people so that not news.
firstdown
06-18-2012, 12:56 PM
no long term politician is. Seriously, lets put their pay back to 50-75K a year, and then see how many stay in office.
Its not the pay they stay for. Its the power and perks that come with the job.
CRedskinsRule
06-18-2012, 01:04 PM
Its not the pay they stay for. Its the power and perks that come with the job.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I doubt they all would stay if they were paid at true middle class pay, with effective regulations on the "perks" of the job.
Chico23231
06-18-2012, 01:06 PM
no long term politician is. Seriously, lets put their pay back to 50-75K a year, and then see how many stay in office.
thats why we need term limits in the house and the senate.
firstdown
06-18-2012, 01:26 PM
I don't necessarily disagree, but I doubt they all would stay if they were paid at true middle class pay, with effective regulations on the "perks" of the job.
I would guess most take a pay cut when they run for office. Most are worth millions and you don't get that way over night making $174,000 a year. That's really good money but not great.
firstdown
06-18-2012, 01:27 PM
thats why we need term limits in the house and the senate.
Two terms and a small pension plan.
firstdown
06-18-2012, 03:42 PM
http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/250950_379228148798982_1587591935_n.jpg
If that was the case then the elevator was installed prior the new laws requiring them to be wheel chair accessible. When new regulations are passed existings buildings get grandfathered unlass they do a major renovation. Seems like someone wanted a very expensive bill passed and he vetoed the unfair legislation.
NC_Skins
06-18-2012, 04:20 PM
If that was the case then the elevator was installed prior the new laws requiring them to be wheel chair accessible. When new regulations are passed existings buildings get grandfathered unlass they do a major renovation. Seems like someone wanted a very expensive bill passed and he vetoed the unfair legislation.
Coming from a guy who had a elevator closed off to anybody but his own personal use is quite funny.
Romney remembered as CEO governor - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/07/politics/romney-massachusetts/index.html)
"He had three security people around him, and you could never get to touch him or say hello," said state Rep. Frank Smizik, chairman of the House Committee on Global Warming and Climate Change. "He was very elitist."
On this reporter's unannounced visit to the Legislature, there was no shortage of Democratic lawmakers who complained about Romney's unprecedented move to block off one State House elevator specifically for the governor's office.
"He took over the elevator for the west wing of the building. He kept it only for his staff and him," Smizik said.
Listening in on Smizik's comments, another Democrat, state Rep. Ellen Story, said the elevator restrictions and security ropes installed outside Romney's office turned off some lawmakers for good.
"When Romney came in, he treated government like the only thing he ever knew, which was big business, and he was the CEO of the big business," Story said.
Why are you defending this douche bag? ...lol