Daseal
10-17-2012, 07:26 PM
Saw this on reddit, nailed this thread...
http://i.imgur.com/PKs3b.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/PKs3b.jpg
2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
[122]
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
Daseal 10-17-2012, 07:26 PM Saw this on reddit, nailed this thread... http://i.imgur.com/PKs3b.jpg Giantone 10-17-2012, 07:28 PM Actually he did not call it an act of terror. Romney was right and the moderator needs to shut the F*&k up if she does not know what she is talking about. LOL, wow.I will agree on one thing with you.....there are alot of people that need to shut the F*&k up ...as you put it becuase they come on here and don't know shit and then go ballistic when proven wrong. hooskins 10-17-2012, 08:43 PM Thanks I like that. Awesome. A society with increasing income disparities. We keep on keeping on then the "American Dream" becomes just that. A dream. And thanks for a relevant reply after NCskins explained his (and frankly the rest of this nation's) understanding of the quote. Giantone 10-18-2012, 04:07 AM i think its effing joke how much coverage this bs of when it was called a terriorist attack. Jesus, arent there more important issues? Thank You, absolutly.Problem is "both sides" just want to tear down the other rather than make a good case for election. firstdown 10-18-2012, 10:41 AM So if Obama did in fact call it a terrorist attack on the 12th how come on the 16th did they go on the talk shows and call it an uncontrolled mob attack? I would guess to cover up them ingnoring request for additional security and warning of an attack. We also now know that Biden lied in the debate when he said the reason for not calling it a terrorist attack was because at first they did not know it was a terrorist attack. Biden said they didn't know for some time that it was a terroist attack but Obama now says he called it a terrorist attack the very next day. Slingin Sammy 33 10-18-2012, 10:49 AM The latest: RealClearPolitics - 2012 Election Maps - Electoral Map (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map.html) More bad news for Obama: RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Direction of Country (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/direction_of_country-902.html) also Obama job approval below 50%, not looking good. Slingin Sammy 33 10-18-2012, 10:52 AM So if Obama did in fact call it a terrorist attack on the 12th how come on the 16th did they go on the talk shows and call it an uncontrolled mob attack? I would guess to cover up them ingnoring request for additional security and warning of an attack. We also now know that Biden lied in the debate when he said the reason for not calling it a terrorist attack was because at first they did not know it was a terrorist attack. Biden said they didn't know for some time that it was a terroist attack but Obama now says he called it a terrorist attack the very next day.and to the UN, and in WH press conferences, and on other shows until the 25th of Sept. The Obama Admin botched this one big time....and as always the cover-up is worse than the event itself. budw38 10-18-2012, 01:29 PM Are you really that bad at reading comprehension? Can you not see where he transitions from talking about 9/11 the prior day to the events that happened the night prior? I'll underline the key part of this that transitions. Just because he mentioned the the prior day being 9/11 doesn't mean he was talking about 9/11 in regards to the part on terror. Continue on believing bullshit that is plain as day. Also, who gives a flying **** if he blamed it on the video or called it act of terror? Really? Does it ****ing matter? Hell no. It's just another GOP tactic to distract the uneducated and cult members from the real issues. (of them wanting to keep the rich large and in charge) Which is it ,does the GOP want to " keep " the rich in charge or pander to the " uneducated / cult " ? So the GOP " Keeps " the rich in charge , does this mean the Dems want homeless / junkies in charge and put the rich into poverty ? Anyone with a work ethic can succeed in the US , if they so desire , DEMS and REPS have little to ZERO control over this . SBXVII 10-18-2012, 01:54 PM Shall we jump on some of the other lies that were stated? Timothy P. Carney: Obama's 'war on women' canard is not fooling women | WashingtonExaminer.com (http://washingtonexaminer.com/timothy-p.-carney-obamas-war-on-women-canard-is-not-fooling-women/article/2511033) Obama argues tax claims in debate (http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-argues-tax-claims-in-debate/) I also love this: Oh no! We can’t let Romney win, he’ll let lobbyists in the White House!!! | WashingtonExaminer.com (http://washingtonexaminer.com/oh-no-we-cant-let-romney-win-hell-let-lobbyists-in-the-white-house/article/2510879#.UH6lNG9_vTr) Slingin Sammy 33 10-18-2012, 02:35 PM Evaluation of Romney tax plan, quick summary, it lifts personal income across all income brackets by approx 7.4%. Similar plans were enacted by JFK, Reagan and W, all achieved economic success. Simulating the Economic Effects of Romney's Tax Plan | Tax Foundation (http://taxfoundation.org/article/simulating-economic-effects-romneys-tax-plan) |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum