2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)


NC_Skins
10-15-2012, 03:58 PM
Where have you been. I could start with Sandra Fluke.

Sandra Fluke - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Fluke)

Sure. I can pull up many conservative fear mongers wanting to go to war with Iran/Iraq/Syria....and others. THEY MIGHT BOMB US GUYS SO LETS DRIVE THE COUNTRY BROKE TO PROTECT OURSELVES.

Stalemate. (again)


As I said, I pay for shit that I don't want to pay for and it covers a larger percentage of the budget than you having to pay for abortion/birth control. Just like the typical GOPer. Bitching about a penny while thousands of dollars are swindled right out the back door.

Slingin Sammy 33
10-15-2012, 04:14 PM
As I said, I pay for shit that I don't want to pay for and it covers a larger percentage of the budget than you having to pay for abortion/birth control. Just like the typical GOPer. Bitching about a penny while thousands of dollars are swindled right out the back door.Providing for National Defense is part of the Constitution. Providing for birth control and abortions is not....Checkmate.

If we collectively don't provide for defense, we will be invaded and will have no freedom. If federal tax dollars do not provide for birth control/abortion, women who desire these services can pay for them out-of-pocket. Just like I have to pay out-of-pocket for my personal firearms.

The Declaration of Independence provides for Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and also states we are endowed by our Creator with those rights. Why shouldn't the government protect these rights for the most vulnerable....the unborn? Typical far left lib....provide cradle to grave nanny state services for all in the name of "fairness"....yet advocate for the gov't funding of infanticide.

NC_Skins
10-15-2012, 04:24 PM
Providing for National Defense is part of the Constitution. Providing for birth control and abortions is not....Checkmate.

If we collectively don't provide for defense, we will be invaded and will have no freedom. If federal tax dollars do not provide for birth control/abortion, women who desire these services can pay for them out-of-pocket. Just like I have to pay out-of-pocket for my personal firearms.



I'm sorry. How many trillions of dollars have we spent on military and how many countries have invaded us? Yeah....I didn't think so. I have no problem spending money on a defense to secure our borders, NOT fight in countries and on situations that have nothing to do with us. We are broke because of our war/military budget, NOT because of birth control and abortions. Again, you are crying about pennies when trillions are being robbed over failed moronic foreign policies.

firstdown
10-15-2012, 07:15 PM
I'm sorry. How many trillions of dollars have we spent on military and how many countries have invaded us? Yeah....I didn't think so. I have no problem spending money on a defense to secure our borders, NOT fight in countries and on situations that have nothing to do with us. We are broke because of our war/military budget, NOT because of birth control and abortions. Again, you are crying about pennies when trillions are being robbed over failed moronic foreign policies.

You answered your own argument. Look I'm all for cutting back defense spending along with everthing else. My point was not about spending my point was they define womens rights as things other pay for.

Giantone
10-15-2012, 07:26 PM
How come a womans rights are me paying for their birth controls and abortions?



....so no women pays anything,nothing,not taxes,nada?

NC_Skins
10-15-2012, 07:29 PM
The Senate is the Democrats’ to lose as five more states shift | The Signal - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/signal/senate-democrats-lose-five-more-states-shift-172719794.html)

Instead of voting in Democrats, they should be voting in non-partisan people who don't answer to corporate America.

CRedskinsRule
10-15-2012, 07:37 PM
The Senate is the Democrats’ to lose as five more states shift | The Signal - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/signal/senate-democrats-lose-five-more-states-shift-172719794.html)

Instead of voting in Democrats, they should be voting in non-partisan people who don't answer to corporate America.

Anyone else wish they let the libertarian and green candidates participate in the presidential debate.

Daseal
10-15-2012, 11:45 PM
The Senate is the Democrats’ to lose as five more states shift | The Signal - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/signal/senate-democrats-lose-five-more-states-shift-172719794.html)

Instead of voting in Democrats, they should be voting in non-partisan people who don't answer to corporate America.

So... don't vote?

NC_Skins
10-16-2012, 08:25 AM
So... don't vote?

They have people on the ballot that don't answer to Corporate America.

Alvin Walton
10-16-2012, 10:20 AM
Heres another tits up company Obama gave money to.
Nice job, Barry!

Electric Car Battery Maker A123 Systems Files Bankruptcy - Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-16/electric-car-battery-maker-a123-systems-files-bankruptcy.html?cmpid=yhoo)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum