2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)

i guess with its good news with unemployment under 8% we cant look at it objective? So part time jobs JUST started getting included in employment numbers? I guess we should root for a continuation of unemployment/people struggling for Mitt's sake?

i guess with its good news with unemployment under 8% we cant look at it objective? So part time jobs JUST started getting included in employment numbers? I guess we should root for a continuation of unemployment/people struggling for Mitt's sake?


Thats all im trying to do. And i dont think firstdown or anyone here is routing for a continuation of bad numbers.

I dont think there has ever been this type of disparity before. Its not just a big difference, its a huge difference. Looking at it objectively is trying to figure out why.

Thats all im trying to do. And i dont think firstdown or anyone here is routing for a continuation of bad numbers.

I dont think there has ever been this type of disparity before. Its not just a big difference, its a huge difference. Looking at it objectively is trying to figure out why.

Let me help you then, lower unemployment numbers are good. Its always a positive, never a negative.

i guess with its good news with unemployment under 8% we cant look at it objective? So part time jobs JUST started getting included in employment numbers? I guess we should root for a continuation of unemployment/people struggling for Mitt's sake?

Funny now the left wants to look at things objectively. When Bush was in office when someone lost their job it made national news and the country was going to hell. Any positive news about the economy was then followed by 4 or 5 negative things about the economy. I just point out that alot of the jobs were part time jobs (which is true) and the left gets all up set.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/05/opinion/krugman-romneys-sick-joke.html?smid=FB-nytimes&WT.mc_id=OP-E-FB-SM-LIN-RSJ-100512-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click


There really should be buzzers or fact checkers in debates to BUZZ when candidates are lying.

i guess with its good news with unemployment under 8% we cant look at it objective? So part time jobs JUST started getting included in employment numbers? I guess we should root for a continuation of unemployment/people struggling for Mitt's sake?


What side is having the melt down?

EPIC MELTDOWN: Chris Matthews UNLOADS On Obama after First presidential DEBATE - YouTube


and this one never gets old

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE

this is what happens to liberals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HgMSKCfwvQ

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/05/opinion/krugman-romneys-sick-joke.html?smid=FB-nytimes&WT.mc_id=OP-E-FB-SM-LIN-RSJ-100512-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click


There really should be buzzers or fact checkers in debates to BUZZ when candidates are lying.Electric shock collars around the candidates necks, jolts administered to be decided by CBO, factcheck.org, whatever organizations can be determined to be fair if any.

And have a 2 minute "shot clock" visible in front of them (so the debaters can see it, and and behind them so all the observers can see it.) When time's up, the debater's mike is cut off and camera cut away, so the moderator can tell the other debater his time is about to start. No exceptions. If the debater tries to continue talking, he gets shocked.

And have more than the Big Two party candidates in these debates. Libertarian, Green, Communist, Constitution, any other decent size parties, at least pick a couple to make it at least a four way debate. It might make things more honest.

I know this is all fanciful, but can we at least have the electric shock collars?

I know you live in the People's Republic of MD and don't get out much....but I would refer you to these polls that show on abortion and gay marriage a majority do not support those positions: :cool-smil
SS ,you're way to smart to fall for that poll crap, you and I both know it's bias,where were the calls made to ,....bet a bunch were to the "Bible belt"now call SanFran and see how many are against same sex marriage.

http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/547477_299236103497771_123753431046040_675224_1706 278863_n.jpg

LOL! How that guy is still ahead in the polls is a mystery to me.

LOL! How that guy is still ahead in the polls is a mystery to me.

Because the guy he's running against is even worse. Sad but true.